Jump to content

User talk:Nice1dude11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 22:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mission: Impossible (film series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 22:33, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Puss in Boots (2011 film), you may be blocked from editing.  -- WikHead (talk) 22:45, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Men in Black 3, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  -- WikHead (talk) 22:47, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 23:43, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nice1dude11 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

You can't take the privilege of being an Administrator so badly and wrongly. Made a very, very wrong block you did!

Decline reason:

No reason for unblock provided. Tiderolls 00:02, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.