User talk:Nic tan33
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!=
[edit]
|
WikiProject Futurama
[edit]Hello Nic tan33,
I noticed that you have recently edited articles to do with Futurama. I was wondering if you would like to join WikiProject Futurama. Please add your name to the participants list and drop a line on my talk page if your interested.
Cheers, Jasrocks 07:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Anyways thanks for joining. Please keep advertising, have 3 tests 2morow :(. Cheers, Jasrocks 09:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
User:Bonafide.hustla
[edit]User:Bonafide.hustla has a really warped conception of Taiwan, China, and Asian culture and ethnicities in general. All of that is not a problem - I have a really warped perception of, for example, a high school teacher whom I hate very much. The problem is that User:Bonafide.hustla does not understand the concept of consensus that underlies discussions on Wikipedia. That is, editorial conflicts of opinion are resolved by consensus.
Another problem is that User:Bonafide.hustla confuses NPOV with anarchy - he seems to think that his opinion should always be represented, no matter how narrow its basis of support; even prevail over other, more widely held opinions.
I don't seem to be able to get through to him on these points, so until he gets shut up by due process, I guess I will have no choice but to continue reverting his edits - which are increasingly becoming vandalistic. If you have some spare space on your watchlist, could you also keep an eye on Takeshi Kaneshiro? Thanks. --Sumple (Talk) 10:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Edit warring isn't get you anywhere. Deletion and revert without reason and discussion is bad faith to the project especially when you're reverting it to a version previously introduced by a troll. Your hostility toward me only emphasize your lack of good faith in the project. There is also the issue of stalking and possible sockpuppetry (use of IP address to keep your contribution clean) as you constantly revert the same articles as Sumple and stalk me to revert anythin I edited. Cheer up, son. Life is short--Certified.Gangsta 09:11, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Dear 'User:Certified.Gangsta', if you want to accuse me of something, why don't you bring up some proper evidence instead of making veiled threats. In any case, I will not be intimidated by the likes of you. Also, do not be so quick to fault other of having 'a lack of good faith' especially when you refuse to show 'good faith' yourself. If you bothered to discuss and give evidence to your dear edits, then this situation need not have happened. Do follow your 'advice' you so proudly proclaim, and lets make things better. Have a nice day, kid. Life's short indeed. Nic tan33 09:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Articles for Deletion: Holophonor and Planet Express Ship
[edit]As pointed out by Stardust8212, both the Planet Express Ship and Holophonor articles are currently marked for deletion. Your comments thereon would be really appreciated. DrWho42 06:20, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Please stop blanking/reverting edits to this page. If you find the humour personally offensive -- that is completely beside the point. Wikipedia is not meant to be a place to suit your POV or particular sensitivities. If you can find a reference that shows that his Wrong Way joke did not exist during this episode, cite it.
- I have deleted the material and added a comment on talk about why I think the "joke" is unencyclopedic. Wikipedia is not, after all, a repository of all human knowledge. If we go around adding things about every single joke Monty Python has ever made we'd be up to here with fluff.
- The added section is also not written in an encyclopedic tone. --Sumple (Talk) 11:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic, not written in an encyclopedic tone. These are all your POV. You both should ask why you are trying to blank these edits.
- A couple of admins have stepped in - they will probably deal with this sensibly if the disruptions continue. While I assume good faith, it probably won't be too effective trying to reason with the anon user when he or she simply labels any attempt at rational argument as "all your POV", as you can see from this page. I'll continue to keep watch on the article concerned. --Sumple (Talk) 05:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- You assume good faith when you go around black-marking others? You could of had a reasonable debate in the first place, but you chose to first go and blank other's edits and making accusations. I have yet to see some of your rational arguements -- indeed, mostly blanking.
You're welcome. And thank you for persisting with what you consider to be right, and not giving up in the face of all the problems. enochlau (talk) 09:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Sure, I'm always around if you need help. Have fun. enochlau (talk) 11:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
As a participant in the debate, I invite you to comment on the straw poll I have set up. This straw poll has been listed at Wikipedia:Current surveys as well. enochlau (talk) 22:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Nice userpage
[edit]Didn't know you were an Aussie! lol. Interesting selection of user boxes. Happy Birthday! I'm "staying tuned for more". --Sumple (Talk) 21:38, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Ehh? You're in Melbourne? Cool :D Actually I take that back, Melbourne's not cool, Sydney's better :P Happy birthday as well. And thanks for your contributions so far. enochlau (talk) 23:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
It's still going... ridiculous. Anything you can do would be appreciated. enochlau (talk) 00:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Certified.Gangsta (talk · contribs)'s edits
[edit]Greetings, I noticed you have reverted some of Certified.Gangsta (talk · contribs), (formerly known as Bonafide.hustla (talk · contribs)) edits before. He is aggressively pushing his POV on China/Taiwan-related articles and his edits are increasingly becoming vandalistic. Could you help keep an eye over his edits? See his contributions for details. Please reply here. Thanks. Guardian Tiger 16:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
A request for arbitration has been filed regarding the conduct of Certified.Gangsta.
Can I trouble you to write a statement at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Certified.Gangsta-Ideogram recounting your interactions with him and your impressions of his conduct as an editor?
Thanks.
LionheartX 17:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Futurama Roll Call
[edit]Hello, you are currently listed as a member of Wikiproject Futurama though you may be inactive. This seems to be the case for many members so I am sending this message to help renew interest in working on these articles. If you are still interested in working on Futurama related tasks please visit the wikiproject page to see how you can help. If you have time please also join in the recent discussions on the talk page, in particular I would personally appreciate comments on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Futurama#A new proposal for episode articles. Thank you for your time, hopefully I didn't annoy you too much. If you would not like to receive messages such as this in the future then consider removing yourself from Wikipedia:WikiProject Futurama/List of participants. Happy editing. Stardust8212 01:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Re: Wang Wei (pilot)
[edit]I noticed that - but I'm not sure what we should do about it. Any ideas? I have a feeling he's just not going to give in. (Although from his user page, it seems like he's here just for the ArbCom elections, so he should go away again soon?) enochlau (talk) 03:19, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Futurama revival
[edit]Hello. WikiProject Futurama is being revived. Since you are listed as a participant here, you have received this message to make sure you still are. If you like to help update the WikiProject, please discuss here. Hopefully you can stay with us and continue to work on Futurama-related articles. GamerPro64 (talk) delivered by MuZebot 06:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Melbourne meetup this Saturday
[edit]
|
Melbourne Meetup
|
 | |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 04:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Melbourne)
Melbourne meetup
[edit]Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:51, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26
[edit] |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 07:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)
The article Infinity (wargame) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Tagged for six months but no improvement in style, no sign of reliable independent sources being forthcoming and none found on a Google search. Only independent source cited is now a 404 error.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 22:47, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
The article Corvus Belli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Tagged for over three years but no sign of reliable independent sources being forthcoming and none found on a Google search. (That the company exists and is an important one for wargamers is beyond question - I am an enthusiastic customer. But I can't see this surviving CSD if it were to be newly written today.)
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 22:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)