User talk:Nic H. Nguyen/sandbox/articledraft

Article Peer Review

Overall, I thought that the article was vastly improved by the edits. The first section is clear and concise. Overall, while some words ares still unfamiliar to me, the whole article was made easier for the average person to read than the language of the original. The information about the animal was well organized and the headings made sense where they are in the article. The sources seem reliable and factual. The content was factual and in an encyclopedic style. There was one sentence I found difficult to understand grammatically which was in Distribution and Habitat being, but on rare occasions at night found swimming at the shore in the sub-tidal zone". Also,"diet is on shrimps". The aforementioned words that I feel should be clarified are, undulations, and raportorial. I highlighted any other possible grammatical errors that I questioned. Overall, the coverage was good for the amount of information available. Ahd3100 (talk) 15:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)