User talk:Nibuod
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Nibuod, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Brian 10:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)btball
Your VandalProof Application
[edit]Dear Nibuod,
Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you have only been a member of the project a week - and I really need to see some recent change patrol work first. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. - Glen 12:08, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message. Just to respond to the concerns on my talk page, it wasn't at all a bulk rejection, and it did not have to do with your edit count. As mentioned above, quite simply there's no evidence of any prior vandalism patrolling on your part, and we need to ensure that VP users do understand when you use the appropriate {{test}} template as the software does not choose for you. Hope this makes sense, and I look forward approving your app very soon. - Glen 11:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism work
[edit]Several times you have beaten me to revert vandalism. Keep up the hard work. :) So in recognition of this
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Well done for all your work on reverting vandalism. Mike 15:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC) |
VandalSniper
[edit]Thanks for applying to use VandalSniper! You have been approved. If have not already done so, you may find instructions to install VS on the project page.
As some of the libraries VandalSniper runs on are currently in transition, there have been a few issues reported with setup. At the moment, Linux is the most compatible platform for VS. If you have questions or problems, you may find help on the project page or its talk page. Please also feel free to contact me for help and I will do my best to assist you.
Thanks for becoming a part of one of Wikipedia's best new software tools! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:20, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof! 1.3
[edit]Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Anaraug! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see this for the approved list. Andeh 16:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Your technical reversion compromised Business continuity planning clean-up (peer review process ) and suggested "how-to" migration process of guidelines to Wikibooks
Upcoming template changes
[edit]Hi, I've just noticed that you recently left a templated userpage message. I'm just bringing to your attention that the format and context of these templates will be shortly changing. It is recommended that you visit WikiProject user warnings and harmonisation discussion pages to find out how these changes could affect the templates you use. We also would appreciate any insights or thoughts you may have on the subject. Thanks for your understanding. Best regards Khukri (talk . contribs) 14:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thanks, good work
[edit]Thanks for catching the second vandalism incident on Personages of the Three Kingdoms. Megalodon99 (Talk) 15:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Request for Reconsideration
[edit]http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/ActionScript
Using written language in its pure form reduces the ability to efficiently share complex information with the reader. Professional con artists know this, and break the rules to better suit their needs and increase positive response. The tactic, though practiced by evil men, is not evil.
My alterations used a little sarcasm, humor, and misinformation in an attempt to transmit knowledge to readers in an indirect, yet more convincing fashion than supported by the standard rules of English grammer and strict interpretations of Wikipedia laws.
You appear to be a person of reasonable intelligence. As a C# programmer, you would quickly discover the many serious shortcomings of Flash and ActionScript were you ever to attempt development using these "technologies". If you were to compare your personal experience and knowledge to the message I burried within the article on ActionScript, you would find that, while the letter of the law was broken, the spirit was not.
I trust you will take this information into proper consideration, and I am confident you will ultimately find that my alterations produced vast improvements to the article's utility.
Good day, sir.
Sorry; thanks.
BCP Reversion Feedback (6o26am)
[edit]Compromised MBCP revisions As a master busines continuity planner since 1995 with prior experience dating to 1970, I tried to provide a competent peer review update when my "learn & share" efforts got reverted.
- Also see graphic posted via Talk:Systems thinking
- geoWIZard-Passports 23:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Wikimania 2008 in Cape Town
[edit]Hi. Would you be interested in helping to ensure Wikimania 2008 is held in Cape Town? If so, please go to the Cape Town bid page, and sign up on the discussion page. Feel free to dive right in with adding suggestions, or fleshing out the bid! I'd greatly appreciate any help, no matter how small. Greenman 23:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
South African Wikimedia Chapter
[edit]Hi there :) The idea of setting up a local Wikimedia chapter has been discussed by South African Wikipedians (and those associated with other Wikimedia projects) for some time now, and we want to help turn this dream into a reality. There are currently over 25 chapters established around the world, and several more planned and being discussed, but so far, none in Africa. A South African chapter, should it become a reality, would be a continental first. If you're interested in being involved in the creation of a South African Wikimedia Chapter, could you please email me directly at wikipedia@africancommons.org Kaydee 68 (talk) 13:55, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
South African Wikimedia Chapter update and mailing list
[edit]Hi there. Local Wikipedians have set up a mailing list where we will be discussing the formation of a local Wikimedia Chapter in South Africa. Please join the mailing list at this url https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaza. There is also a page set up on Meta where you can add your name if you're interested to take this idea forward. Check out http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_South_Africa. Thanks Kaydee 68 (talk) 09:05, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Call for Wikipedians in Residence in Africa
[edit]Hello,
I hope you are well and thriving!! WikiAfrica has just put out a call for two Wikipedians in Residence. One in Cape Town at WikiAfrica, at the Africa Centre; and the other for WikiAfrica Cameroon in Douala, at doual’art. If you are interested, please contact either Marilyn [marilyn.doualabelldoualart.org] for the WikiAfrica Cameroon call or Isla [islahfafricacentre.net] for the WikiAfrica position in Cape Town.
If you are not interested in applying, I would be very grateful if you could spread this call far and wide among your networks to ensure that both projects get excellent candidates. Here is the link for the information page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/two-wikipedians-in-residence-for-africa/
Best regards, Islahaddow
(This message was sent using Lucia Bot at 22:29, 16 November 2012 (UTC))
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
[edit]Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)