User talk:Nibbanibba

Welcome!

Hello, Nibbanibba, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -🐦Do☭torWho42 (📼) 02:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Punch (rapper)

The article Punch (rapper) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 00:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sir (musician)

The article Sir (musician) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. J 947^{^{^(c)}} 00:38, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zacari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zacari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zacari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Esprit15d • talk • contribs 01:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Carrollton Heist, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Camp Flog Gnaw. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:48, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fred the Godson

The article Fred the Godson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Slither Snake Sempter, 00:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Loyalty is Royalty

The article Loyalty is Royalty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any reliable sources failing GNG and NALBUM and perhaps TOOSOON.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 14:41, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Big Fish Theory

The article Big Fish Theory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 01:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Big Fish Theory for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Fish Theory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Fish Theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ronny J

The article Ronny J has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 21:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ctrl (album) move

why? Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I moved it back. If there is another disambiguation article required, feel free to explain that when you make the move again, but WP:PRECISION does not require the level of detail that you suggested. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see, Ctrl (SZA album). It doesn't appear to meet WP:NALBUM yet. I won't nominate it for deletion, because it's likely a case of WP:TOOSOON, and it may be the natural target. I'll add it to my watchlist and deal with that. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chevy Woods. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:23, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:49, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rtjfan. Thank you. 153.204.79.69 (talk) 06:28, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Punch (rapper) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Punch (rapper) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punch (rapper) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]