User talk:Nhorlick

Welcome!

Hello, Nhorlick, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Martin Francis Damian Baker, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WWGB (talk) 07:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martin Francis Damian Baker

The article Martin Francis Damian Baker has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 07:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Hello Nhorlick. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Nicola Horlick, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 08:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Martin Francis Damian Baker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Martin Francis Damian Baker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. bonadea contributions talk 12:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nicola Horlick, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 08:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editor assistance

Hi Nicola. I noticed your request for editor assistance, regarding a reference to Madoff. Can you let me know where this reference is so that I can investigate further? Worm^TT · (talk) 09:01, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just found it at Nicola Horlick. I'll do some digging. Worm^TT · (talk) 09:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One recommendation is to contact Wikipedia at info-en-q@wikipedia.org per WP:LIBEL. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sock-puppet

As already noted, this is a sock-puppet of Nicola. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.105.254 (talk) 10:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Nicola Horlick, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Nicola Horlick— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:58, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nicola Horlick. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 17:18, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

You have responses.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Your recent edits to Nicola Horlick could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 13:06, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We are more than willing to hear and potentially address your concerns. However, making legal threats is strictly prohibited, as described above, and you risk being blocked from editing unless you withdraw the threat. You can pursue your grievances in the courts of your country or on Wikipedia, you cannot do both. Again, if there is incorrect information, we want to hear what it is and why it is incorrect. Please explain on the article talk page(Talk:Nicola Horlick). 331dot (talk) 13:45, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:02, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]