User talk:Newtonslaw40

Newtonslaw40, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Newtonslaw40! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:HostBot! I will check it out. Newtonslaw40 (talk) 15:48, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Global Intelligence Alliance Group

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Global Intelligence Alliance Group, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Gobal Intelligence Alliance Group. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gobal Intelligence Alliance Group

If this ever happens again just use speedy G6 WP:G6 with an explanation, or blank the page and add a speedy G7 WP:G7. Another approach is to just move the misspelled article to the correct name. Meters (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Meters for the feedback. This is very helpful, and well noted.Newtonslaw40 (talk) 15:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Newtonslaw40! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:28, Sunday, September 25, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Newtonslaw40. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Fusion Consulting, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Lemongirl942 for your comments. I always welcome feedback and thoughts from fellow wikipedians. I can confirm I have no conflict of interest per wikipedia's guidelines with the company in question. I can also confirm I have never been involved with the company in the article in question. Though I have been involved in the research industry (from 1972 to 1998) as a provider (in a different segment of the business research industry than the company in question - in fact before the company in question was founded) and a buyer of related services within a multinational corporation. So you can say I am somewhat of an industry expert. From that perspective I can see the notability and potential value of covering this company for future readers. And I can also confirm I am in no way being compensated for commenting on this article. Wikipedia is strictly a hobby for me. I really like the concept of preserving knowledge and history, it is a passion for me. My interest is in capturing and preserving the profile of notable companies (even if those have been acquired by another company) primarily (but not exclusively) in the industry I know best, which is business research. I hope to create articles for many dozens of such companies to preserve that knowledge and make wikipedia a great reference source about the research industry. If you have any further concerns you would like to voice, please let me know, I would be most happy to address. Newtonslaw40 (talk) 15:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Hi there, I noticed that at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JM Family Enterprises you did not sign your recent comment. Just wanted to give you a head's up so you could sign it. Safehaven86 (talk) 02:03, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Safehaven86!! Very much appreciate your feedback. Will add it now. Newtonslaw40 (talk) 13:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:41, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Global Intelligence Alliance Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Global Intelligence Alliance Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 07:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Company logo2015xxxx.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Company logo2015xxxx.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]