User talk:Newcrusade

Welcome!

Hello, Newcrusade, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jayjg ^(talk) 17:21, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Where to put comments

Please comment on suggested changes to article content on the Talk: page of the article in question. In this case you'll find it at Talk:Christianity and anti-Semitism. Jayjg ^(talk) 17:21, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Kudos to you, Newcrusade, for your attempts at accuracy and fairness. Str1977 18:57, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jayjg. I will post soon. It's just that I am short of time sometimes and I cannot guarantee that I will be able to keep up posting everyday. Newcrusade 20:17, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

EffK is forced to Abandon a Corrupted Wikipedia

I refer you to my response of a few moments ago at 15 December [[1]],http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/EffK/Evidence#3_December_2005 EffK 03:09, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Appeal to nature. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 18:33, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:37, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Newcrusade reported by User:Alexbrn (Result: ). Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 18:40, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3RR block

Hi. You've been blocked from editing for 24 hours due to violating the Three revert rule. Please be more careful in the future. El_C 18:54, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Newcrusade. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Newcrusade. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Aquinas

Good morning Newcrusade, I have cited in the WP article of Aquinas two passages of the threaty De Regno, that you have previously provided in the discussion page. Now, they are introduced with the regards to the divine and human law and the facto that Aquinas limited the political power and subordinated degrees of freedom of kings to the will of God. I would like to sipoint this out with better sources, hoping in any eventual aid.

Finally, in the talk page there is a new topic concerning the biography of Aquinas in the website of the Italian commune of Aquino. No one of those anecdotes Is referenced in the article, while some of them -namely, the episode of Saint Albertus the Great and the mute steer- are mentioned in the Italian textbooks. Possibly, non Italian users are more easy to find more accurate and English-language sources. Thanks in advance for any eventual aid.--Theologian81sp (talk)