User talk:Newcrewforu

DRC

Welcome!

Hello, Newcrewforu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Hi, you might want to read WP:DRC

Thanks, --Killing Vector (talk) 02:16, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diagnosis: Userpagious emptiosus

WELCOME

Greetings and Welcome! I noticed that your username shows up red when you post an edit -- in case you were wondering why, this is because your userpage is devoid of content. If you were to place anything at all on your userpage (text, photographs, etc.), your username would then appear blue by default. By convention, most contributing editors who intend on becoming a part of the Wikipedia family generally place information about themselves on their userpages to let people know a little about themselves. As a result, editors whose usernames are still red may (however unjustly, yet, nonetheless) appear to other editors as lacking a serious motivation in both editing Wikipedia articles as well as joining the Wikipedia community at large. Although it is not at all required, I therefore recommend that you place something on your userpage, such as information relating to your city of residence or occupation -- basically anything that will allow another editor to identify with you and peer into your mind a bit. You can check out other editors' userpages to get an idea of what is normally included (find them easiest by checking the history tab on randomly chosen yet substantial articles), and even copy/paste from other editors' userpages (modifying the information to reflect your own, of course). DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 22:41, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dave Zirin. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Editor437 (talk) 00:26, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a POV edit which violates Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons is not edit warring, even if done more than three times. See Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule#Reverting_without_edit_warring. Don't threaten to block me. You are violating Don't bite the newbies. (Yes, I've been studying wikipolicy)Newcrewforu (talk) 00:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to User:347Editor. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 04:58, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Query

Hello. Could you explain why you made these reverts to what are prima facie legitimate talk page comments:

Thanks. CIreland (talk) 05:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

Hello, Newcrewforu. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[WP:ANI]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --CIreland (talk) 05:09, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/96.247.37.61 (2nd nomination) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 07:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/96.247.37.61 (3rd), and you are therefore blocked indefinitely.

– Clockwork Soul 09:28, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]