User talk:Newburgh12550

Welcome!

Hello, Newburgh12550, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as NoelSpencer, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! McGeddon (talk) 15:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NoelSpencer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NoelSpencer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McGeddon (talk) 15:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Noel C. Spencer

The article Noel C. Spencer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. OnionRing (talk) 17:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello. You recently removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Noel C. Spencer, and I wanted to let you know that it has been replaced. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. OnionRing (talk) 17:43, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, as you did with Noel C. Spencer, unless reliable sources have been provided. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. OnionRing (talk) 17:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Noel C. Spencer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noel C. Spencer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noel C. Spencer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. OnionRing (talk) 18:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Noel C. Spencer has been properly cited using multiple news outlets though not all based in the U.S they are credible news outlets that verify the achievements of Noel C. Spencer. Also the article Noel C. Spencer meets the qualifications of Wikipedia's notable person criteria because of his involvement in government. There is a precedent for local county legislature having articles ex. Michael Kaplowitz. Newburgh12550 (talk) 13:50, 07 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noel C. Spencer

If you want to have another shot, I will undelete the article in a draft or a userspace page where you can work on it. That is necessary in order to maintain the history. Because it was deleted at AfD, you should not simply post it again (it would probably be speedy-deleted), but let me know when it is ready. If I am really convinced, I may agree to it being posted; more likely I will tell you to apply at WP:Deletion review, giving a link to the draft.

The new references would have to be quite substantial, and about Spencer in some depth (see WP:42), not just mentioning him. There were already a number of Jamaican references in the deleted article, but they did not convince the AfD !voters. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:45, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]