Jump to content

User talk:Neven Lovrić

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Neven Lovrić, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 15:53, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Targets of the State Security Service (Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia)

[edit]

Category:Targets of the State Security Service (Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 01:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mihovil Lovrić for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mihovil Lovrić is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mihovil Lovrić until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Peter James (talk) 16:56, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:15, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mihovil Lovrić (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Beating, Croatian, Detention, Search and Slapping

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Coffee // have a cup // essay // 15:28, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you list the specific sentences from the deleted Mihovil Lovrić article – if you require via some channel hidden from public view – which need more sources and/or more reliable sources? No participants of the deletion discussion improved the article nor pointed to any specifics so that I can do it. I do not have time to provide a citation for every possible challenge. Everything stated in the article is true as far as I have been able to find out from primary and/or secondary sources. What specifically needs to be done to the article for it to be on Wikipedia? -- Neven Lovrić (talk) 16:03, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Read WP:BLP and you'll find out that it doesn't matter if you "do not have time to provide a citation for every possible challenge". If you don't have time to source the content, then you don't have time to add the content. To quote our policy: "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source, which is usually done with an inline citation." Either comply with this standard or I'll block you from ever editing the site again. This isn't something we treat very lightly around here. Coffee // have a cup // essay // 20:13, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you wish to appeal you can write to WP:UTRS thanks.  Spartaz Humbug! 16:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]