User talk:Neurorocker

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to Skyline Turbine do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ipatrol (talk) 22:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Blood-brain barrier, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Blood-brain barrier was changed by Neurorocker (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-02-02T20:27:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Skyline Turbine

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Skyline Turbine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

only weak assertion of notability is in relation to the UVa project, and the cite only supports that project as being notable, not even that this company is inheriting any notability from it--only passing mention of the company's product as being used. Much of the article here is hopeless PR-speak

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DMacks (talk) 19:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Skyline Turbine

An article that you have been involved in editing, Skyline Turbine, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyline Turbine. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DMacks (talk) 03:29, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:ZO-1 in cortical microvessels.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:ZO-1 in cortical microvessels.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Astrocytre.jpg

File:Astrocytre.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Astrocytre.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Astrocytre.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:29, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nate Dunn

The article Nate Dunn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced artist article of questionable notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hasteur (talk) 20:06, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

216

Your addition of the impeachment vote count to 216 (number) seems inappropriate. It's an historic event, but not all details are important. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:52, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]