User talk:Jane0112

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:NeurondAI/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:NeurondAI/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 07:10, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, NeurondAI! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 07:10, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:NeurondAI/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:NeurondAI/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – robertsky (talk) 07:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

• Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jane0112 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia team,

I'm Jane, from Vietnam.

I'm an accountant and I have experience in accounting, auditing, finance and technology.

Firstly, I'm very sorry about my current username violated Wikipedia's policy. Because I'm a new member of Wikipedia so I have not read the policy carefully and I have just known that when you send a message notice blocks my account.

Secondly, after three days to read more about Wikipedia, I have fully understood that the reason for my blocking was an incorrect use of my real name (until now, I have read the username policy clearly) and the article didn't meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy. I will never repeat the kind of edits for which I was blocked.

If I'm unblocked, I intend to contribute content about my insights related to accounting, auditing, finance, technology,... or the useful information I know to everyone. And of course, I will base on a neutral point of view and refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources.

I think contributing content to Wikipedia is to develop information and content that brings knowledge to people so I promise I never receive any money for my contribution.

Once again, I'm very sorry about my mistake and I promise I will never repeat it. Please understand and allow me to continue being an active and positive contributor to Wikipedia.

Thank you so much and have a nice day! Best regards, Jane

Accept reason:

I'm assuming good faith and unblocking. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:46, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Jane. I am very much in favour of giving editors in your situation a second chance, more so, I think, than most administrators, so I would like to unblock you and let you edit again. However, there is one thing about your unblock request which gives me concern. It looks as though you don't understand why the draft you created was unacceptable, and if that is true then if you are unblocked you are likely to make the same mistake again. Can you try to give a clear explanation of what you understand to be the reason why the page was considered unacceptable, and therefore has been deleted? JBW (talk) 22:48, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Dear JBW,

Thank you for your consideration.

I understand the reason why the page was considered unacceptable. Because my draft is like an advertisement, it's not an entry in an encyclopedia. It refers to non-independent sources (external links to a company website) and it's not a neutral point of view.

If I write a contribution in the future I will refer to reliable sources and write from a neutral point of view.

Once again, thank you so much give me the chance to continually contribute to Wikipedia.

Best wishes,

Jane

globally renamed NeurondAI to Jane0112

globally renamed NeurondAI to Jane0112 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:57, 20 August 2021 (UTC)