User talk:NeuroNick69120

This is NeuroNick69120's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Hilmar Bading has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hilmar Bading. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hilmar Bading (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for academics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references appear to be to his own work. If he meets academic notability guidelines, please indicate how.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hilmar Bading and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nbio-UniHeidelberg-Germany, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hilmar Bading (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

per previous comment

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hilmar Bading and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 15:51, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hilmar Bading has been accepted

Hilmar Bading, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Worldbruce (talk) 12:37, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:HilmarBading.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HilmarBading.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:HilmarBading.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:HilmarBading.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 23:20, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:HilmarBading.jpg

You uploaded, File:HilmarBading.jpg, where you either stated or implied that you had permission of a third party to upload it; or that evidence of such permission would be provided on request.

Unless there's some record of that permission, it's harder to confirm if any given permission is genuine. Wikipedia currently needs the permission to be explicitly proven at the time of upload, and recorded in the OTRS permission queue, for this reason.

Please read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, which advises on how to confirm permissions you obtained from a third party.

It is also advisable to ask the third-party what source attribution they desire, as opposed to marking the image as having been "sent personally".

If permission is not confirmed, and recorded as detailed above, the media may have to be removed so that Wikipedia stays in compliance with copyright law and policy in some jurisdictions.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:20, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Nbio-UniHeidelberg-Germany. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page FundaMental Pharma, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Captain Calm (talk) 14:34, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Foundation BrainAid moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Foundation BrainAid, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Captain Calm (talk) 14:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:46, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FundaMental Pharma moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, FundaMental Pharma, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NeuroNick69120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

NeuroNick69120 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

New user name has been approved. 2 'self-promotion' articles will be deleted. No compensation was, is or will be received. It is my intention to provide useful articles based on personally acquired knowledge.

Decline reason:

First the good news, thanks for taking care of the username. Second, the bad - your future intention "to provide useful articles based on personally acquired knowledge" is a fundamental misunderstanding of what Wikipedia is about. Wikipedia's 2nd pillar requires verifiable content. Knowing something is nowhere near enough, you need to prove it with reference to reliable, verifiable, independent sources. I note that you've never received a "welcome" message (which is how most of us get introduced to the house rules) so, incongruous as it seems for a user who's been here for 5 years, I'll add a welcome message below. Please take the time to get a handle on the broad themes of the wiki's way of working and I'm sure your next appeal will be successful. Please use {{unblock|Your reason here}} next time. -- Cabayi (talk) 10:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome NeuroNick69120!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 40,319,471 registered editors!

Hello NeuroNick69120. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Cabayi, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The five pillars of Wikipedia

Editing tutorial

How to edit a page

Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode

How to develop an article

How to create an article

Help pages

What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:

Do be bold

Do assume good faith

Do be civil

Do keep cool!

Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam

Don't infringe copyright

Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest

Don't commit vandalism

Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:

Ask a question

or you can:

Get help at the Teahouse

or even:

Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:

Fight vandalism

Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome

Help contribute to articles

Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you

Help design new templates

Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.

Please remember to:

Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Cabayi (talk) 10:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NeuroNick69120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

'personally acquired knowledge' will cite authoritative sources, predominantly peer-reviewed publications.

Decline reason:

This is incomprehensible. Please speak in complete sentences. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:37, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NeuroNick69120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

New user name has been approved. 2 'self-promotion' articles will be deleted. No compensation was, is or will be received. It is my intention to provide useful articles citing authoritative sources, predominantly peer-reviewed publications.

Decline reason:

No response to query below in two weeks. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NeuroNick69120 (talk) 10:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify what topics you intend to write about? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New user name has been approved. 2 'self-promotion' articles will be deleted. No compensation was, is or will be received. It is my intention to provide useful articles in the scientific field of neurobiology citing authoritative sources, predominantly peer-reviewed publications. NeuroNick69120 (talk) 16:26, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NeuroNick69120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

New user name has been approved. 2 'self-promotion' articles will be deleted. No compensation was, is or will be received. It is my intention to provide useful articles in the scientific field of neurobiology citing authoritative sources, predominantly peer-reviewed publications.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: NMDAR-TRPM4 interaction interface inhibitor (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Supporting refs are principally primary sources - only one is not so. No evidence that this topic has demonstrated notability even within the very niche neuro-pharmacological sphere

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NMDAR-TRPM4 interaction interface inhibitor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NMDAR-TRPM4 interaction interface inhibitor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

NeuroNick69120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I continue to be blocked (after having changed my user name, as requested) because two pages created by me 'FundaMental Pharma' and 'Foundation BrainAid' were deemed to be 'advertising or promotion'. Although this was not my intention I have already stated that I will delete those pages as soon as I am able and will be more careful in future. Any new articles or edits to existing articles on my part will be factual and attributable to published sources. I have not, do not and will not be receive any compensation for any articles edited or created by me - on the contrary, I have made financial donations to Wikipedia as I value it as a reference source and look forward to adding to it. NeuroNick69120 (talk) 11:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I'm going to assume good faith and see what happens. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:25, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let's try this again. What do you intend to edit, if unblocked? SQL ^{Query me!} 00:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Two pages created by me 'FundaMental Pharma' and 'Foundation BrainAid' were deemed to be 'advertising or promotion'. This was not my intention and I will delete those articles (if they still exist) as soon as I am unblocked and be more careful in future. My area of expertise is neurobiology and related new articles or edits to existing articles will be factual and attributable to published sources. I have not, do not and will not be receive any compensation for any articles edited or created by me - on the contrary, I have made financial donations to Wikipedia as I value it as an unbiased source of reference.NeuroNick69120 (talk) 14:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the unblock formatting from this comment. There is no reason to open multiple requests at the same time. SQL ^{Query me!} 21:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Foundation BrainAid

Hello, NeuroNick69120. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Foundation BrainAid, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:FundaMental Pharma

Hello, NeuroNick69120. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FundaMental Pharma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:FundaMental Pharma

Hello, NeuroNick69120. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FundaMental Pharma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:NMDAR-TRPM4 interaction interface inhibitor

Hello, NeuroNick69120. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NMDAR-TRPM4 interaction interface inhibitor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:NMDAR-TRPM4 interaction interface inhibitor has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:NMDAR-TRPM4 interaction interface inhibitor. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 22:29, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NMDAR-TRPM4 interaction interface inhibitor

Hello, NeuroNick69120. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NMDAR-TRPM4 interaction interface inhibitor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]