User talk:Netdragon
Map of Metro Atlanta
[edit]Greetings,
Regarding your below map:
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Atlanta-suburbs.png
Forsyth County had a population of 175,000+ people in 2010 and, given its relatively small area, is more than dense enough to be considered one of Metro Atlanta's second-tier counties (Fulton, Gwinnett, Cobb, and DeKalb would be first-tier).
Compared to, say, Lamar County (population under 17,000), with a population 1/10th as much, I think there is a difference between second-ring counties (such as Rockdale, Coweta, Forsyth) and outer-edge counties that may be counted as part of a "statistical" area, but don't really feel like metro Atlanta (i.e., Lamar, Butts, Polk, Pickens, etc).
So, could you update your map? Ryoung122 17:14, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Forsyth county is not considered inner-tier metro Atlanta and therefore should not go on the map. Cumming is already on the map. Netdragon (talk) 02:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- After some time thinking about this, I think the map should just reflect MSA. The list of "main" counties probably came from self-serving Atlanta city planner type sources originally. See new talk https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Atlanta_metropolitan_area#New_Cobb_County_and_South_Fulton_cities_and_1990s_counties Netdragon (talk) 04:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- I should mention that these definitions may change eventually, so an eye should be kept on this. The main counties were designated decades ago when Forsyth, Cherokee, Paulding, Douglas, etc didn't have that many people. However, until a majority of people and authorities depict Forsyth as a main county, it should remain ancillary Netdragon (talk) 19:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Netdragon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Netdragon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Netdragon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)