User talk:Nesmith74

May 2013

Hello, I'm GSK. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Off the Deep End, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 00:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The additions, even on talk pages, that you are adding are factually incorrect, and since you continue to add them, they seem to be trolling bait. We welcoming useful contributions, but if you continue to add information that you knowing aware is false or cannot be backed up by sources, you may find yourself temporarily blocked from editing. --MASEM (t) 18:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What the fuck is trolling. I don't do drugs. Can't leave the hose, have ankle bracklet for 3 DUIS. I am starting this week as chief editior on Weird Al related projects, and other pop musics stars. Got this position Monday.Nesmith74 (talk) 19:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that your continued edits are not appropriate, and I've brought your behavior up at WP:AN (see [1]) --MASEM (t) 19:49, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nesmith74 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

MASEM has it out for me for some reason. I am new to the wiki, and went into "talk" sessions first to throw ideas about that might be used in the main articles. I did not know that i could not talk about my life on these sights. And i don't know what trolling is. I use my wife's stories on these help pages because she is well versed in pop culture and medicare. I think MASEM has a problem with her vast knowledge, or the fact that she has down syndrome makes him uncomfortable (likely)...so he lashed out at me front behind his computer. Please unblock so I can help. A have a massive amount of wiki users and editors behind me on this oneNesmith74 (talk) 20:08, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see zero evidence that you are here to contribute constructively. Find another outlet for your personal anecdotes. Kinu ^t/_c 20:25, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nesmith74. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rs chen 7754 20:55, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]