User talk:NeonHD

Welcome!

Hello, NeonHD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to do lots more. Some useful pages to visit are:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:49, 26 April 2015 (UTC).

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi NeonHD! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 03:31, Wednesday, June 15, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Comments

Please note that edit summaries are not for leaving messages to other editors – use the relevant talk page instead. Notes such as you left in the history of the page 2016 serve nothing because they're impossible to refer to. Also, your reasoning was wrong, I recommend reading the guidelines (WP:RY) and the discussion on this topic so you can be more constructive. — Yerpo ^Eh? 05:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DerbyCountyinNZ vandalism

This guy keeps removing the Orlando terrorist attacks from the 2016 article. Ridiculous!! --99.239.80.203 (talk) 17:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We should all create a partition to ban him from editing that article, he thinks he's the only mod on that page but he's not. NeonHD (talk) 21:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Amortias (T)(C) 00:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because an editor has expressed a concern that this account is suspected to be a compromised account. Note that edits to your user talk page may not indicate that you have regained control of your account. If your ability to email other users and edit your user talk page have been revoked, contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org. Amortias (T)(C) 00:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NeonHD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is not a compromised account, it is a personal account with a history of contributions to wiki articles. Please appeal this block.

Decline reason:

If the account is not compromised, then you have clearly trolled. Huon (talk) 23:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So this was you? PhilKnight (talk) 00:14, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And [1] this?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]