User talk:Neo Samus

Hello Neo Samus! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! TJ Spyke 22:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

NeoGAF

Just wondering, are you the same Neo Samus that posts on NeoGAF? TJ Spyke 07:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual Console

Neither side is doing anything wrong. This is technically a content dispute, but they shouldn't be removing the info since there has never been any consensus. I suppose we could ask for mediation. TJ Spyke 19:22, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation. Both sides have to agree to mediation though. TJ Spyke 19:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now people are debating whether or not to go through formal mediation, so just hold on. --Cheesemeister3k 15:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assume good faith

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this.

As a note to go along with this: calling people assholes here: User_talk:TJ_Spyke#Virtual_Console_NA, isn't needed and it's very disrespectful. RobJ1981 23:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the shoe fits...Lamename3000

Late comment but LOL!! Sorry had to be done, plus, it's my talk page. Neo Samus 05:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you might want to consider reading WP:TALK and WP:User page. Your user and talk pages belong to Wikipedia and everything you submit is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Drumpler 21:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow....It's a joke. Could you please calm down? I understand rules very well thank you very much. Neo Samus 21:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...Neo Samus, RobJ actually has a bad history when dealing with users as well. If you saw Wikipedia:Wikiquette _alerts#User:Angrymansr ~~under User:Angrymansr~~, there is TONS OF EVIDENCE what RobJ1981 has been saying! Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 06:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Be civil

Your comment of Why can't you just admit when you are wrong? The pros out weigh the cons in this matter. is a bit rude. People are allowed to have opinions that differ from you. Basically forcing people to admit they are wrong (that's the way I see it at least) isn't helping the discussion. Because people disagree with you, doesn't give you the right to be uncivil towards them. This shouldn't be new to you either, as I warned you about good faith before (which goes along with being civil). Comment about the article and changes to it, don't go around forcing people to admit mistakes because you disagree with their views. RobJ1981 18:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am being civil. It's a simple question, which requires a simple answer. You are no ray of sunshine either. Also, its not just directed towards you. I do apologize if you felt that way. I'll try better to state who I'm directing my comments towards. Neo Samus 20:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was a question that wasn't civil. Even if it wasn't directed at me: it was still rude. Claiming someone else is wrong (and trying to force them to admit it) isn't helpful to any discussion. As I said before: comment and discuss the article itself, don't comment on editors (that you don't agree with). RobJ1981 05:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

To revert an article, go to the revision you want to go to, then click the link that says "Revision as of.." and then click edit, and then save. Good question with a simple (i think..) answer Lamename3000 08:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VC 11/19

I have just posted the info on the talkpage as usual. TJ Spyke 02:09, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if Rob will ever admit he is wrong (he is very stubborn and doesn't back down unles there is an overwhelming consensus against him). TJ Spyke 00:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue posting for those interestered, at the very least it will be in the edit log. You are right about Rob, he was pretty much the sole reason the article was fully protected for several weeks (and then re-protected again after less than a day). TJ Spyke 01:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link. (And I see you corrected your missing letter. :P --LN3000 (talk) 20:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NeoGAF

I don't know what I did, but I was banned until January 6th with the reason listed as "snark elsewhere". TJ Spyke 00:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Since Rob seemed to complain, do you mind that I fixed the links in your post on the NA VC page? I didn't change the actual post, I just made sure the links were correct. TJ Spyke 23:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I was talking about the talk page. Rob had reverted my edit by saying not to edit other peoples comments (even though I didn't change what you wrote, all I did was fix the links). TJ Spyke 00:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1080° Snowboarding VC

Where'd you find the release date for 1080° Snowboarding on VC? I'd like to update the ref to a more comprehensive one, but couldn't find it.--CM (talk) 00:18, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its cool; thanks for the website, I added it.--CM (talk) 21:42, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

VC: Powerball

Hey, where did you find it on Sega? Versus22 (talk) 15:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thats strange that you can see Nintendo's press and not Sega's. Versus22 (talk) 15:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am tired of seeing "Unknown" in the release date column. Did you see LN3000's comment on the discussion page? Versus22 (talk) 15:35, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sega Press

http://www.sega-press.com How does it work? Versus22 (talk) 16:16, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Page

Hey Neo Samus! The Header sound familiar right? :) I just like to thank you (and MrDrake for the idea as well. (VC games) Versus22 (talk) 20:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I like putting my list of Wii games on a different page. Also, about your username it reminds me of the Character Samus. Mine of course means your facing someone. Anyways, back to Wikipedia... Did you notice a minor change on your user page? (below the user boxes). I fixed it by adding br clear=all (< before br, > after all) below. (I know I wasn't really supposed to do that, I just wanted to help you). Have a good day! :) Versus22 (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...Forgot to mention "22" is my favorite #. Versus22 (talk) 14:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense Neo Samus! :) Versus22 (talk) 14:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SSBB

I know we shouldn't really say this here, but what is your Brawl code?
Vernon: 0903-2644-5156 (yeah my real name is vernon). Versus22 (talk) 23:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC) ...unless you tell me your email.Versus22 (talk) 23:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, do you even have this game? Versus22 (talk) 01:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I actually replied on my talk page. Versus22 (talk) 05:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All right, hope it works (I live north of the border from you (Canada). By the way, did you check out the RfD page? (see message below). Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 02:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Available 4p.m. PT/7p.m. ET today or tomorrow (Monday, Tuesday). Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 12:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't know. I thought it was in the east time zone...I guess not. Okay I'm on 6-8 then 9:15-12am. **All times are in your zone (CDT).** Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 22:52, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was doing the same. I'm going to log in now on this game, maybe we'll do a match. Do you have another user from another country on your list? Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 02:11, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFC discussion of User:RobJ1981

Hello Neo Samus, a request for comments has been filed concerning the conduct of RobJ1981. You are invited to share your thoughts about this user @ Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RobJ1981. Thank you. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 05:47, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo WFC

Yes I have MKW... I'll look my code up.

I'll try the Brawl code again, (kept on saying "Awaiting Registration").

Actually, it would be better if we exchange Wii Numbers to avoid any further discussion here on Wikipedia (friend codes)

6054-5734-3415-4866. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 21:31, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I need yours too. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 00:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So..

What's your best time on Super Metroid? 66.57.44.247 (talk) 21:20, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]