User talk:NeoHealthCare

Halifax Health

Excellent work on the Halifax Health article, it's now much less stubbly and unattractive than it was prior to your overhaul. Looks great! (It's on my watchlist for one reason or another, which is why I've noticed) My only concern is the lack of sources. Any way you could finish up your work with the addition of reliable sources, preferably with in-text citations? ♠P M C♠ 06:22, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Halifax Health Medical Center

I have nominated Halifax Health Medical Center, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halifax Health Medical Center. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? benjicharlton (talk) 05:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:NeoHealthCare/SandBox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:NeoHealthCare/SandBox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages: user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for businesses.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page in question and leave a note on this page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calton | Talk 07:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll hold off on deleting this article-in-progress in your userspace for now, as long as you continue to work on making it less promotional. If it travels to article-space in the current form, it will be deleted. Wikipedians strongly object to articles that sound like they might be a brochure for the company ... in fact, they want the articles deleted on sight, before the articles get picked up by Google and other search indexes. If someone might think from reading your article, "Hey, that sounds great, where do I sign up?", then we probably don't want it in Wikipedia. An objective, neutral review of significant businesses is sometimes okay; see WP:SPAM and WP:CORP.