User talk:NeoApsara
Welcome!
Hello, NeoApsara, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --BarbD 21:05, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
I apologize, and I fixed it. Thank you.NeoApsara 21:51, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Feminism
[edit]I think you've done a good job in removing some of the vague / unsourced commentry on the Feminism page, NeoApsara. Well done! --Zleitzen 21:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Cambodia
[edit]Hi, this is CanCanDuo and you seem to express interest in Cambodia. I want to gather support for a Wikiproject regarding Cambodia, its culture and people. If you're interested, click http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Cambodia. Thank you ^.^ ! (CanCanDuo 04:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC))
- You didn't bother to give a name or anything as I requested, so I deleted your spam.NeoApsara
Misandry
[edit]Misandry (IPA [mɪ.ˈsæn.dri]) is the hatred of men. The word comes from misos (Greek μίσος, "hatred") + andras (Greek ἀνδρας, "man"). Although misandry is sometimes confused with misanthropy, the terms are not interchangeable, since the latter refers to the hatred of humanity in general. An idea related to misandry is androphobia, the fear of men, but not necessarily the hatred of men. This seems to describe you !!!! Mjal 03:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the Feminist Userbox!
[edit]I was taking a look at your user page and you have a feminist user box. I definitely like having that up on my page, as I am most certainly a feminist. As to the assertion above that you're a misandronist, I've heard that term applied to myself as well. Don't sweat it really, they're typically upset at any woman who dares to think that women might be equal to or better than a man. *sigh* Silly boys. --Puellanivis 21:38, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Kurt Cobain
[edit]Thank you for weighing in at the Kurt page. I completely agree with you about the forces at work there. Thing is, as I understand wiki, there is nothing ChrisB can do if all three of us (you, me, and M A Mason) change this page. He can only revert it so many times in a given amount of time before he's breaking a wiki rule. I would prefer, of course, to call a vote on my suggestion, but I don't know how. I believe I can make an effective case to an impartial interest, and am bored of talking to ChrisB about this. Do you know how to call a vote or editors to this matter? If not, I would be willing to collaborate with you and M A Mason in deliberately doing an edit war with ChrisB in order to change the page dramatically. Wikipedia pages are going to be some of the most-read sources on artists (it already is a top 3 hit on most Google searches), and I want this slander to be evicted. What do you think? Mistertruffles 13:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
On the Kurt Cobain talk page, you wrote:
“The 1.52 figure includes both free morphine and conjugated (metabolized) morphine.”
What is your source for this information? The police report issued in 2014 just says “1.52mg/L of Morphine” but does not specify if the toxicology panel was for “free” or “total” morphine. Since the autopsy is private then how do we know?
Let me say, I am only asking, because I came across this case in my study of forensic toxicology. And reading all the conspiracy theories made me feel sick for the real victims, the Cobain family, who have had to endure decades of BS.
If there was a credible source stating more details about his toxicology we could once and for all debunk all these theories. And maybe people would finally leave his widow alone about it. Gistya (talk) 02:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
User Page
[edit]I reverted what looked like some grafitti on your user page - hope that was ok Paxse 17:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Death of Kurt Cobain
[edit]Edit wars are ridiculous, and can readily be avoided if you would enter discussion on the page. -- ChrisB (talk) 04:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Father's rights movement
[edit]There are several problems with the external links you just replaced on Fathers' rights movement. Please discuss on the talk page before reverting. WLU (talk) 15:54, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Please link me to the discussion so I can see if my concerns were dealt with already. WLU (talk) 19:45, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]Hi NeoApsara!
I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 22:25, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative
[edit]| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi NeoApsara! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! |
WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!
[edit]| WikiWomen - We need you! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi NeoApsara! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:59, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)