User talk:Nellyingles

hi guys just wondewring why ive been blocked two member Richard3120 and Sjo kept removing varied stuff from bros page, the content I used came from wiki commons, I and your accuing me of tom Watkin who is this guy, so is this case that two members who maybe just one member with two account after doing some research have no knowledge of 0f the 80s band, bros when they removed content they failed to provide a valid reason. so is wiki for true facts of for people to bully others. the thing is the facts are out their on other media sites, this makes wiki to be laughing joke of untrue facts. I asked for help and didn't get it why does wiki allow this, I suppose is form internet bulling by people against new newcomers

Welcome

HI GUYS, I HAD SOME EDITS REMOVED BY RICHARD 1320 I NOT SURE WHY AS INFORMATION BEEN SOURCES THREW WIKI COMMON. LIVENATION, TICKETMASTER SMASHHITS POLL WINNER PARTY IN RELATION TO BROS 1989 THREE AWARDS COULD SOME PLEASE ADVISE WHY THIS MEMBER REMOVED THEM AS I A LITLE SCARED TO HET INTO ARGUMENT

No argument - my edit summary clearly states that the sources you provided are either non-existent or unreliable. Wikipedia Commons can't be used as a source for Wikipedia itself, and Ticketmaster is just a sales website. Richard3120 (talk) 14:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editor now indeffed as sock. Richard3120 (talk) 15:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome	to	Wikipedia!
Nellyingles!

I've noticed some of your contributions and I want to say hello!
Have a look at the links below if you want to learn more about editing Wikipedia:
Introduction	Tutorial	Editing Wikipedia articles
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia	Writing your very first article	HELP ME!
Here are some of the basic Wikipedia policies that you should be aware of:
Be BOLD!	Assume good faith	Be civil and polite
Don't infringe copyright	Vandals aren't nice	Don't get blocked
If you need any more help, visit the teahouse for friendly help from other editors, or go on the Wikipedia Adventure for a fun and interactive way of learning about Wikipedia.
And if you still have unanswered questions, ask me a question on my talk page or on yours, putting a `{{help me}}` template next to it and someone will come to help you soon.

Bros

You have provided no sources at all for the claim of 25 million sales or reaching the top ten in 20 countries, so it is untrue to say that I have acted unfairly. It is your responsibility to provide reliable sources for those claims. Richard3120 (talk) 14:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nellyingles (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Nellyingles (talk) 18:25, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.