User talk:Nelly GTFC

Good job on the Andy Cook

	Great job in fact!
	Hey Nelly. Good job on the Andy Cook article. I see you really want the article to be notable and if there is anyway I can help dont be afraid to ask. Good luck and I hope your work does not fall in vain. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 03:00, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I second that sentiment, however yet again the article has been faced with another..yes another nomination for deletion. I thought I would inform you. All the best. Footballgy (talk) 11:03, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Andi Thanoj

Hi Nelly, how do you think a crack at making an Andi Thanoj and Shaun Pearson page will go down? Do you reckon there are enough stories and sources for notability? Regards UTM Footballgy (talk) 23:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pádraig Amond, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dan Connor and Ulster Senior League. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conor Henderson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Yates. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grimsby Telegraph, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nelly GTFC. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 21 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Jamey Osborne (footballer) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal comments

Avoid comments like this please. Giant Snowman 21:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, apology accepted - remember we are here to work together to build an encyclopedia. Giant Snowman 07:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sam Jones (footballer, born 1991)

The article Sam Jones (footballer, born 1991) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 18:54, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diallang Jaiyesimi

I suggest next time you try and talk to me rather than running to ANI... Giant Snowman 18:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:BLPPRIMARY. Giant Snowman 17:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jamille Matt

When reverting editors in order to restore unsourced material (in violation of WP:BLP) please ensure you do not restore vandalism at the same time (Matt's height). Ta, Giant Snowman 18:21, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry About Recent Dispute

Hello, I am contacting you about a recent discussion you were involved in on the administrator's noticeboard. I understand your version of the Diallang Jaiyesimi article was replaced by another editor. I am reaching out to you because I am writing an in depth article about the management of Wikipedia. I find your case interesting since GiantSnowman has commented on other articles you have edited, outside of the one in question on the administrator's noticeboard. Would you be willing to talk to me more about this situation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Investigativereporter (talk • contribs) 17:08, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nelly GTFC. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bill Appleyard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Scott (footballer)

The first version of the page was created 3 months before Royroydeb's version. As there was duplication, there was a merge. Giant Snowman 14:34, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What date is the first version of the page, linked above? It's not 28 April 2018...the fact that it was a sandbox is irrelevant. Giant Snowman 16:11, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, let me put it this way. You create an article about Zlatan Beckham in the morning. I create an article about the same topic in the afternoon. Not realising one already exists, I create it at a different location - Zlat Beckham. The two pages are later merged, because we can't have two articles about the same topic but we need to maintain the page histories of both. Do you understand that? It's quote a common occurence. It's also what happened with the Charlie Scott page, except the earlier one was in a sandbox rather than mainspace. Do you understand that? If so, what point are you trying to make? If not, then please review WP:CIR ASAP. Giant Snowman 19:54, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the first version though. That's a different version. Why can't you see that?! Giant Snowman 07:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Brandon Buckley) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Brandon Buckley, Nelly GTFC!

Wikipedia editor SkyGazer 512 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment on SkyGazer 512's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 13:08, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hull Daily Mail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nelly GTFC. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting in Touch

Hi Nelly GTFC. I noticed that you've made some corrections to the Wiki page for the company I work for. Our page could use some significant updates, but I'm no expert on editing a Wiki page and was hoping to touch base with you regarding your expertise. Let me know if you're interested in chatting about this further. Looking forward to hearing back from you. Cheers! Shibberachi (talk) 05:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Pettit moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Andrew Pettit. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 18:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've created it again, I got muddled. I have added some more paragraphs with references and continuing to find more, should it be turned back into draft? --Nelly GTFC (talk) 19:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Andrew Pettit. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I did let Broc (talk) know what's happend, I'm trying to move it as we speak. --Nelly GTFC (talk) 19:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Nelly GTFC! Your additions to Andrew Pettit have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]