User talk:Neko jarashi
AfD nomination of Seraphic Blue
[edit]An editor has nominated Seraphic Blue, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seraphic Blue and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Was redirecting the best course of action? I don't see any consensus on the talk page. Rtac contributions 16:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
You say I should have moved all the contents onto Vampire? I thought concensus was reached after user:Pi zero agreed with my proposition. Perhaps my decision was wrong in some way? Neko jarashi (talk) 16:45, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silfade until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.