User talk:Neitherday/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Neitherday. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
RE: possessive terminology discussion
Hi Neitherday. Do you mind if I copy the discussion we had on the Project gender studies To do talk page to the new talk page? I'd like to do this so that any new comers to the discussion can see all the relevant points--Cailil talk 18:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Not at all. Go right ahead. Neitherday 23:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Concerning tardive dyskinesia
Clozapine belongs to atypical antipsychotics, and it seem to cause less extrapyramidal symptoms (AFAIK), including tardive dyskinesia. So the phrase that you have deleted, distiguishing the typicals as more harmful in this respect, may be relevant. Best regards, CopperKettle 15:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC) P.S. But I agree that the article needs improvement and more sources should be cited. CopperKettle 15:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- I deleted the phrase because it was stated twice in the opening paragraph and only needed to be stated once. Neitherday 17:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Concerning Feminists for Life page
Hi Neitherday, please keep an eye on the Feminists for Life page, the same person who vandalised it the last time is there again, and is making the same complaints and demands again, and it is probable that they will attempt to vandalize the page again. It is the same person that attempted to delete the pro-life feminism page, because they didn't like it either. I have tried reasoning with this person, however they refuse to listen, and complain that I am making personal attacks when I tell them they are making unfounded claims. I would appreciate any help you could provide. 216.255.40.133 04:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Arlington edits
Greetings & thank you for your improvements to the Arlington page. I moved the "unref" template out of the History section because of the layout problems it was creating - a vast empty space, following a smaller one, near the top of the page. You put this back. There must be a better way. Can the template be shifted to the left and/or shrunk? Hertz1888 16:07, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- I solved the problem by adding references, thereby allowing the unreferenced template to be removed from the section. Neitherday 16:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- That certainly finesses the problem. The page looks much better now. Thanks. Hertz1888 16:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Possible disruptive editor
Hi, I see some of what Bremskraft has done on the article and agree that they seem to be acting in bad faith although I'm not an administrator so unable to really dig through to verify if they've been an editor for a while or what. I've prodded on their talk page for a response to talk page comments that were removed and we'll both have to keep an eye for future activities. Benjiboi 22:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- user has been blocked for 24hrs and seems to have a pretty zealous pro-life conservative POV with religious leanings. My hope is that they'll be more constructive as an editor but keep an eye out for every edit as they do seem persistent. I've added some content to Feminists for Life btw. Benjiboi 09:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. Apparently Ladeda76 did turn out to be another sock puppet as well. [1] Neitherday 14:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi Neitherday, I sent you an email last night - before recent developments in the Bremskraft situation--Cailil talk 23:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Just noticed it, I get so much spam and always set up folder for people I know. Emails from new people can get lost in the spam, sorry about that. I will reply. Neitherday 23:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Gendercator
I don't consider a deletion to be a "salt the earth from the topic" situation, so if you feel strongly that there should be an article, go for it. That said, I suspect the subject is not of lasting interest or notabiity, and that writing about it is a bit presentist. Phil Sandifer 21:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Power and Control
Sad to say this article has been deleted, I could ask for a review, it would be easier I think to start where it was then begin from scratch, I suppose I have a talk page and will look there for commentsBobV01 19:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Trivia debate
Could you please spend a moment to add your 2 cents to Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#Sections vs. collections and also Wikipedia:Requested moves#September 12, 2007? I think that you had strong opinions on this matter on Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Template:Trivia, so in the interest of community consensus I'm letting you know of these two pages where debate is continuing. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
U.S. Public Debt Graph
Hi Nietherday. I've responded to your concerns with the public debt graph on the talk page, and put the graph back into the article. I've also added source information to the image page. Please let me know if you have any further questions, thanks! Citynoise 13:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Response
... is here. :) Photouploaded (talk) 17:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
"Censorship"
I don't think that "censorship" is really a useful charge to employ here. Article talk pages aren't "censored", but they are subject to the talk page guidelines. Comments that are clearly throwaway remarks designed to provoke or inflame controversial topics, and contributing nothing to article improvement, can and should be removed from article talk pages. Please see the talk page guidelines; "Deleting material not relevant to improving the article" is clearly listed as appropriate. Do you think that comment contributes to improving the article? MastCell Talk 23:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- I believe the editor in question is asserting that they disagree with the assertion that Sanger's belief's were among the norm among American intelligentsia of the time — which is reliant to that discussion thread. I agree that they should have phrased their comment in a less inflammatory manner, but it is still relevant to the discussion at hand which was about improving the article. Neitherday (talk) 02:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Imperial Emblem.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Imperial Emblem.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Your edits to Kali's teeth bracelet
The "old self-published geocity page" link you removed is one of the last remaining publicly accessible pieces of documentation from the circle of individuals who were originally responsible for inventing the Kali's teeth bracelet in the first place (or individuals very closely affiliated with them). Furthermore, when you removed this source, then someone popped a "nosource" template on the page. Furthermore, it has quite a bit to do with female dominance (in fact, the Kali's teeth bracelet was invented for the specific purpose of being a female dominance accessory). AnonMoos (talk) 22:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- This discussion belongs on the article's talk page. I have responded there. -Neitherday (talk) 14:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't have any problem with deleting this article. It reads like a lot of OR and somebody's personal fetish. Corvus cornixtalk 02:16, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
From the Library Journal:
McQuain, guest columnist for William Safire's "On Language" column in the New York Times Magazine, surveys "memorable terms" from the "Pathfinder" of the 1840s to the Pathfinder mission to Mars. What he describes as a "systematic explanation" of the historical progress of the American language is divided into three chapters that only partially suggest their content, referring broadly to the person/ spirit, the intellect/mind, and the emotion/heart of Americans and their words. Unfortunately, this narrative format is not user-friendly. The words and their background stories are fascinating, but the book would have benefited enormously from either an index or a different arrangement. Furthermore, the text suffers from the misuse of some words (e.g., "Canadian" goose rather than "Canada" goose) and redundancy (e.g., the "urban legend" featuring alligators in city sewers appears twice within the "tall tales" section). Since the book is well researched, it seems a pity the material isn't better edited and more accessible.--Cathy Sabol, Northern Virginia Community Coll., Herndon —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marshmallowbunnywabbit (talk • contribs) 18:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Excellent reference, I believe it should be added to the article. Thank you for finding it. I'd add it myself, except I don't know the date of the Time's column. However, to maintain NPOV, I think the text should read something like "Linguists, such as Jeffrey McQuain, have been critical of usage of the use of "Canadian" in "Canadian Goose", seeing at a "misuse" of the word." Neitherday (talk) 23:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Michigan Womyn's Music Festival
regarding spelling in Michigan Womyn's Music Festival articleMichigan Womyn's Music Festival: hello neitherday, i would like to further understand the 'nuances'of wikipedia 'style', if you are willing to share with me. i love 'the vastness', but am intimidated by 'the rules'. in regards to this specific article, i tried to change spellings & phrases that acurately reflected the ways the event uses & publishes them. i was thinking that to use other spellings would change the intention of the event's useage. if you have any time or inclination to help me understand this, i would be very appreciative. (i did try to ask for help in general on the article's talk page, but got no response.)Flatbed flirt (talk) 12:24, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Non-standard spellings can confuse readers, especially readers whose native language isn't English. Standard spellings should be used except when quoting others. Wikipedia can discuss the views of those running the event without adopting their alternative spellings. -Neitherday (talk) 15:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Uploading images
Please upload images at Commons. I have just moved Image:Ring Billed Gull.jpg there as part of an effort to clear out all the gull images, but if you have more previous uploads (check your contribs) I'd appreciate it if you could move some there yourself (see WP:MITC). Richard001 (talk) 10:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Camp Trans
Thank you for taking the time to make an effort to look up citations for this article. Spotfixer (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Just trying to be helpful :) Neitherday (talk) 05:45, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
early psychosis
added references Earlypsychosis (talk) 08:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks :) Neitherday (talk) 15:08, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of TheGreatHatsby
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is TheGreatHatsby. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheGreatHatsby (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Kali's teeth bracelet
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Kali's teeth bracelet. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kali's teeth bracelet (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Anti-choice listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anti-choice. Since you had some involvement with the Anti-choice redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:45, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
 |
New England Wikimedia General Meeting | |
|---|---|---|
The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!
| ||
|
| |
| Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England! | ||
Message delivered by Dominic at 08:50, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.
You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard
| U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
 |
Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC) |
2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Brown Headed Cowbird.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:19, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:29, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA
| Sunday July 16, 1-5pm: New England Wiknic | |
|---|---|
  You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" at John F. Kennedy Park, near Harvard Square, Cambridge, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck.
We hope to see you there! --Phoebe (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC) | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)