User talk:Neil Astley

Welcome!

Hello, Neil Astley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Doc Quintana (talk) 20:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Gilbert

Hi Neil, Re Jack Gilbert's death date, the Academy of American Poets have also been liaising with the family and have stated that he died on the Sunday and the family made the announcement on the Tuesday. I have been emailing with the Academy to confirm the dates as there have been conflicting dates given in the press. I am in contact with Knopf publishers in the States also in confirming and trying to find a definitive source to add to the article. Any further reference you can add would be most helpful as WP works by citations. Please see the article talk page for more discussion on the death date. Any help appreciated. Thanks Span (talk) 16:22, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - my information came from Henry Lyman, Jack Gilbert's secretary and literary executor. He assured me that Jack had died on Tuesday 13th at 4.30am in the morning. I therefore used that date in today's obituary in the Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/nov/20/jack-gilbert

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Neil Astley. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bloodaxe Books, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richard Murphy and Jane Clarke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Hello, Neil Astley. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 18:10, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Canterbury Tail: I'm not sure if this is the right way to respond to your comment but I would appreciate clarification on one point. My main input on Wikipedia has been bibliographical: adding missing information on poetry books, missing titles, missing ISBNs, wrong dates, etc. I do this for authors I publish and for many authors I don't publish. My work involves promoting interest in all kinds of poetry and it has always seemed important to me that correct information is available to everyone, which is what appeals to me in particular about Wikipedia. When I see a wrong or out of date entry, I feel I have a responsibility to edit or correct it, in everyone's interest. If I don't do this that information is likely to stand uncorrected and even be used by people as if it were correct, so that the same mistakes get replicated elsewhere, because of how Wikipedia is regarded by so many people as the authoritative resource. Is this conflict of interest?Neil Astley (talk) 21:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]