User talk:NeilKT
|
Cite your sources
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Schulte Roth & Zabel, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. Pairadox (talk) 12:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Seyfarth Shaw, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Redfarmer (talk) 16:40, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- I deleted the first version of this page when it was only an external link. Another administer deleted it a second time. This latest time you created it with a sentence which says how it is notable which is enough for it not to get deleted. You also added a {{hangon}} which placed it in the category "articles for speedy deletion". I removed the hangon so it won't be deleted and I encourage you to expand it.
- I apologize that creating this article has been so hard for you. Please understand that wikipedia get literally hundreds of articles a day that have absolutely no value ("bob is my dog and can fly across the cosmos with his head out the window" and other such nonsense). Because of this, wikipedia routinely deletes any articles that does not contain enough information for someone else to expand the article, or say how the subject is notable. Unfortunately this can sometimes make it hard for a new user to create a legitimate article.
- If you need any more help you can contact me on my talk page. Jon513 (talk) 19:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Baker & Hostetler
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Baker & Hostetler, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Orange Mike | Talk 21:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)