User talk:Neddyseagoon/November 2007

Trial of Penenden Heath

Hi, saw your name and "specialist subject" on the Kent WikiProject. I have recently started the above article, Trial of Penenden Heath and have hit a bit of a brick wall. Most of the premium paper sources are UK journals and, as I now live in Australia, I'm finding it hard to get past what is available for free online. Any chance you could take a look and possibly expand if you have relevant sources to hand? No probs if you can't... Many thanks. Dick G 10:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, if you could give me a list of the ones you've tried, possibly with URLs? Neddyseagoon - talk 10:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, the main one is this: [1] but there are other papers cited in the footnotes in this and this too (word search "Penenden") that I can't get hold of. Prob only going to be possible if you're near or can access a decent British History-stocked library...Much appreciated Dick G 11:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Warren (Austen family friend)

has been proposed for deletion. Please add some more information to the article, or it probably will be deleted.. DGG (talk) 18:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please Expand

Could You please expand your article on post medieval thanks *User:Jonnie d smith

Not much more to say really! Will try nevertheless. Neddyseagoon - talk 10:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Augustinian "Monasteries"

Neddy - you appear to have made the last changes to the Augustinian monasteries pages. Do you know where the listing of all the Czech, Spanish, German, Irish etc friaries have gone since the creation of the English page? I'm a bit shocked they all seem to have disappeared with the stroke of key. Noel (talk) 09:57, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There still seem to be plenty at Category:Augustinian monasteries. Neddyseagoon - talk 09:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of British Christianity

{{History of British Christianity}} I tried to clean this up, pipe a few red links to blue links, and distribute it to the proper articles today. I was roundly unsuccessful, it was removed from both Scottish and Irish articles today. It just doesnt seem to be wanted. Do you have any thoughts abot this box? -- SECisek (talk) 23:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine Art Society

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fine Art Society, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Fine Art Society. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, you don't want to do that! The {prod} tag, which I used, gives the article five days to add sources and show notability. The {hangon} tag, which you added, puts the article in the speedy deletion queue to be deleted within a few minutes. It's fine as it is, and if the org really is notable, you can take the prod off yourself once you've added the sources that show that it meets the guidelines. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:53, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]