User talk:Neddyseagoon/2008/November

Proposed translation for Charles Pierre Claret de Fleurieu

Hi there. I was about to propose a translation of fr:Charles Pierre Claret de Fleurieu, and I notice you have him at User:Neddyseagoon/To do list. Would you object to me asking for the French Wikipedia article to be translated? I was about to put in a request at Wikipedia:Translation, but if you want to do things differently, I could wait. Let me know what you think. Carcharoth (talk) 11:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make a start myself, though if you want to put it up for help with the translation, I'ld welcome that! Neddyseagoon - talk 10:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What you've done looks great! I don't want to overwhelm the translation process, so I'll take that one off the list. I'll still count it as a "translation request" though, just not done through the process (and to be fair, you did it a lot quicker than it would have been done otherwise! :-) Carcharoth (talk) 03:55, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your wonderful new articles

What, what, what, what, what...a flood of Italian museum articles on Wikipedia? Yes, and those new articles you created are great. I am doing New Page Patrol and I enjoyed reading your contributions. Keep up the great work! Ecoleetage (talk) 13:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ecoleetage (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Proposed deletion of Quadriennale

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Quadriennale, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. McWomble (talk) 13:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Ports and harbours of County Durham

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Ports and harbours of County Durham, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Ports and harbours of County Durham has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Ports and harbours of County Durham, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hugh Bigod (peer)

You should have been left a notice about the proposed deletion by the person who placed the tag . Please try to add some material and remove the tag. There should be some in the usual places, like DNB. DGG (talk) 22:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attack on Brest

Hi. I saw that you have make a great job of traduccion on articles around the Roadstead of Brest and the Goulet de Brest. Maybe you are interested to traduce and complete the article about the Attack on Brest. My English is not the best to make such an huge translation. --Mike bzh ^BlaBla 22:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Island at War episodes

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Island at War episodes, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Island at War episodes. Thank you. (Also nominated are the six episode articles of that show.) – sgeureka ^t•c 20:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Paul Mérault Monneron

A tag has been placed on Paul Mérault Monneron requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Kirachinmoku (talk) 12:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. When you create a page please try to upload as much info as possible. otherwise your page risks deletion Kirachinmoku (talk) 12:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Democritus meditating on the seat of the soul

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Democritus meditating on the seat of the soul, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unremarkable Statue

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BurhanAhmed (talk • contribs) 11:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ambrose Lupo

Hi there, I was looking at Ambrose Lupo and noticed the three external links used are all dead; so I tagged them with ^{[dead link‍]} Since you are the editor that put them in, I'd be glad to help fix them if you could give me the book titles and authors or ISBNs. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 01:58, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Pownall

I've removed a link that appeared to lead to a 'John D. Ford'. Was this placed in error or have I misread something? Paste (talk) 16:05, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]