User talk:Nbau1

March 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ingraham High School, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 09:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Nbau1! Thank you for your contributions. This is an encyclopedia, so remember that it's a necessity to include references listing reliable websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. Please understand that these sources should verify the information in a fair and accurate manner. However, you must not copy and paste text you find anywhere, except for short quotations, marked as such with quote marks and carefully cited to the source the quote was taken from. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted by others if unreferenced or referenced poorly or if they are copyright violations. See referencing for beginners for more details.

I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page.

Here are some more pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Adakiko (talk) 09:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ingraham High School

You said that Kim Kardashian attended Ingraham. This Kim Kardashian? No mention of Ingraham on her page. Please check your links? Thank you Adakiko (talk) 09:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ingraham High School. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. JBW (talk) 10:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ingraham High School have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ingraham High School was changed by Nbau1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850373 on 2022-04-13T05:21:07+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ingraham High School. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Zsohl ^(Ta
lk) 05:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. _signed,Willondon (talk) 01:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Ingraham High School. Drmies (talk) 20:23, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You just HAVE to stop writing up promotional stuff. There is no option. Drmies (talk) 20:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 21:20, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nbau1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

discospinster blocked me after I stopped engaging in disruptive behaviors. Now I only use my Wikipedia account to aid its glorious mission of disseminating information and helping the good people of this world find the information they so desperately need. Drmies warned me to stop, so I did. Then discospinster, like the spinster he is, swooped in like a boobish bonehead and blocked me FOR NO REASON! I demand righteous reinstatement immediately in order to remedy the grievous error, that has called into question the very core of Wikipedia's mission and the justice of its libertarian and anarchical system. If you value JUSTICE, if you value HUMANITY, if you value ALL THAT IS GOOD, reinstate me, good sirs. Reinstate me immediately!!!!

Decline reason:

Requests with personal attacks are not considered. 331dot (talk) 08:48, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nbau1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

discospinster blocked me after I stopped engaging in disruptive behaviors. Now I only use my Wikipedia account to aid its glorious mission of disseminating information and helping the good people of this world find the information they so desperately need. Drmies warned me to stop, so I did. Then discospinster, like a majestic but ill-timed eagle, swooped in and blocked me EVEN THOUGH I'M A REFORMED INDIVIDUAL! I demand righteous reinstatement immediately in order to remedy the unfortunate error, that has called into question the very core of Wikipedia's mission and the justice of its libertarian and anarchical system. If you value JUSTICE, if you value HUMANITY, if you value ALL THAT IS GOOD, reinstate me, good sirs. Reinstate me immediately!!!!

Decline reason:

Unblock requests like this won't work. You'll probably get no more than one more chance, so make it count. Yamla (talk) 09:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nbau1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Imagine in my shoes yourself. There is not what is but what could be. A gratifying mixture of hope and optimism, when united, which however unlikely, continues, and in so doing becomes its greater self. Not for which what can see, but rather what a second son of my stature, being so handicapped, and pressured by the egregious institutions of American teenagehood. That in becoming the editor, he transcends himself, and become greater, something which will not die but rather which will be immortal, forever living, never dead. Do not take my life, dear friends. May be I stupid, may be I young, but may be I not unswayed by immortality. Let me open my eyes to the glorious revolution. Let me open my eyes to the will that will overcome. Let me open my eyes to so great a world as that. And in so transcending this life by, given your acceptance of this humble request, becoming, not insignificantly the greatest, and I do not mean this lightly, editor of all time. May be I this in some future time, so please, dear friends, do not close your eyes to this possibility. Open them, and look upon the light. Be not afeared, gentlepeople, of this tide of revolution. Be not afeared, of so great a fervor as that. For in its coming there is hope, for in its coming there is all-consuming greatness. We cannot stop it, you cannot stop it, let it be, let it flourish, let it open its wing and fly, this dream. A dream, which, in so becoming so, will one day overtake all of Wikipedia. So I will state my case clearly: there in a small room in a small house in a small town in a small world lives a boy. And this poor boy, dreaming of immortality etched into the annals of Wikipedia wishes to be reinstated. Do not close your eyes to this hope, open them and rejoice in its coming.

Decline reason:

This reads like it was written by a parody generator. You've also been evading your block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:53, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.