User talk:NavigationGuy
Welcome!
|
Caps in Multilateration
[edit]NavGuy, that's good work on Multilateration. But you've put in a lot of excess capitalization. No need to cap things like "Times of Arrival" and "Multilateration" in a sentence. And headings should always be in sentence case, not title case. I can help fix if you like. Have a Merry Christmas. Dicklyon (talk) 04:24, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 31
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trilateration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dilution of precision (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Category:True Range Multilateration has been nominated for discussion
[edit]Category:True Range Multilateration, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DannyS712 (talk) 01:04, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Distance measuring equipment: pulse-pair time separation
[edit]Thanks for adding those sources etc! Do they clarify whether the same separation-interval is used for both sides of the channel? - that is, for both interrogator and responder?
My idea is to amend the existing text
- the transponder replies by transmitting a pulse pair .. having specified separation
so it says
- the transponder replies by transmitting a pulse pair .. with the same separation
to give more fluent phrasing. Unless of course it’s *not* the same separation!
- SquisherDa (talk) 22:54, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying in the article! Next question (!): what’s the spacing between channel frequencies? The temptation is to note the frequency *range* you state, and split it evenly to define the correct total number of channels: but the temptation is to be resisted because of the holes you mention.
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Review request
[edit]Hi NavigationGuy, I wanted to request your review of the section "Introducing the constrained least squares" under the page https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Pseudo-range_multilateration. It is currently the last section on this page. It clarifies that the closed-form Bancroft solution is suboptimal, and the more recent constrained least squares solutions are an improvement, although they require a few iterations. RChrabieh (talk) 08:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)