User talk:Naveen23006

June 2024

Hello, I'm Oblivy. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Environmental technology, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Oblivy (talk) 01:09, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What does reliable source mean? Should I provide you with source information as well? If yes, So how? I don't know anything about it. Naveen23006 (talk) 02:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can have a look at WP:RS. Oblivy (talk) 03:48, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

where Naveen23006 (talk) 01:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at 100% renewable energy‎, you may be blocked from editing. Oblivy (talk) 03:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

okay Naveen23006 (talk) 05:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had no intention of doing that Naveen23006 (talk) 05:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I add content if links aren't allowed? Naveen23006 (talk) 05:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggested you look at Help:referencing for beginners. Please show you've done that before asking such questions. Oblivy (talk) 06:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Gardening Naturally. Renewal6 (talk) 12:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for promoting the www.gardennk.com website. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Gardennk per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gardennk. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 23:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]