User talk:NaturalizedDeer

Did you just accuse an administrator of vandalism for removing promotional material on Hillel Fuld?

You might be careful with such accusations, unless you have some proof (more than just a single diff demonstrating the article is filled with promotional puff). False accusations of vandalism are easily disproven, and we sanction such new users. BusterD (talk) 13:01, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi NaturalizedDeer! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! BusterD (talk) 13:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BusterD,

Administrator or not, I would like to point out this is what I see in the history and logs.

It clearly shows the entire page being deleted section by section in multiple edits.

Please advise if you see something that I do not. NaturalizedDeer (talk) 14:24, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Though I have come to expect such actors in bad faith from this website especially when they are here for a while and "gather points", there are quotes removed from verified sources as well as relevant data revolving around the person described in this page.

I call it vandalism when someone allows themselves to remove everything they see and uses a loophole rule to justify this.

Rather than just nuking a page, one would expect an editor to review verify and edit the data. But I suppose that would be expecting a Wikipedia administrator to actually do his job ?

Allowing yourself to be biased while editing or changing this site is the root cause of people losing interest in the data shown on Wikipedia over the years.

There is a reason for the general reaction to a wiki link being a laugh emoji. NaturalizedDeer (talk) 14:52, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]