User talk:NatriX

Thank you for experimenting with the page Hot Modern Rock Tracks on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - eo (talk) 16:27, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sputnik Reviews

Thanks for adding the Sputnik reviews, but please keep in mind only staff reviews are permitted to be used in articles per WP:ALBUM. Rehevkor ✉ 20:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please take note of the above message. Consider this your first warning. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 21:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rehevkor ✉ 22:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Love Cycle: Back from the Mystery System. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. UltraMagnus (talk) 21:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Breaking Benjamin. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tim meh 12:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to The More You Ignore Me, the Closer I Get. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 13:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Green Day discography. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. JD554 (talk) 14:28, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

You changed the units sold for Awake in Skillet discography but didn't provide a source for your change. I reverted and provided a source. If you have information to the contrary, feel free to provide it. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:47, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Saturate (album). Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 20:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]