User talk:Natliskeliguten

Welcome!

Hello, Natliskeliguten, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG (talk) 11:28, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

Purple Kangaroo and Purple-necked rock wallaby

Since your the only person (that I know of) that has spoken out aginst merging the Purple Kangaroo and Purple-necked rock wallaby. Now if you agree to it than they can finally be merged and everybody can continue developing these articles. Since you have stoped talking on the discussion page I have decided to come to your user page. My resons for merging these articles are as follows.

Because the name purple kangaroo has been used by the media most people know it by that name
They are the same animal
The pop culture section is still a part of the Purple-necked rock wallaby
As you stated "this animal only has a purplish neck" witch is wrong it also has the purple pigment on its forehead (thus proving that the name Purple-necked rock wallaby" isn't fully correct ether)
As I stated previously Purple Kangaroo is a better known name and this will help the reader locate this page.

So the sooner this is resolved the sooner we can continue expanding this article.

File:2Aseaserpent.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2Aseaserpent.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:30, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Giglioli's Whale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giglioli's Whale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giglioli's Whale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 19:56, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Daedalus 1.jpg

The file File:Daedalus 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Missing source and author information to verify copyright status. Very similar to File:HMS Daedalus with sea serpent.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. matt br 13:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]