User talk:Nativeupload

Speedy deletion nomination of Pearlman's Jewelers

Hello Nativeupload,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pearlman's Jewelers for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —Swpb^talk 14:34, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pearlman's Jewelers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pearlman's Jewelers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearlman's Jewelers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:11, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is File:The Jewel Box 1979.jpg really your picture? You took it in 1979, hung onto it for 35 years, and are just now publishing it? —Cryptic 17:50, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion (on the article D.NEA) but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. ansh 666 22:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you changed the tag from a PROD to incomplete AfD; I've restored the PROD for now. ansh 666 22:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pearlman's Jewelers

Hello Nativeupload,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pearlman's Jewelers for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 19:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Steven Kretchmer Tension Set Ring.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Steven Kretchmer Tension Set Ring.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 20:14, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Michael B engagement ring.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Michael B engagement ring.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 20:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Eternity ring.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Eternity ring.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 20:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Steven Kretchmer Tension Set Ring.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Steven Kretchmer Tension Set Ring.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]