User talk:Nationalsupportteam

Welcome!

Hello, Nationalsupportteam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Parents Centres New Zealand Inc, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wuhwuzdat (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Parents Centres New Zealand Inc

A tag has been placed on Parents Centres New Zealand Inc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A gentle explanation

Hello, Am I correct that you are either an employee(s)/volunteer helper(s) of the NZ Parents Centre? While I am sure that your intentions were good, I would urge you to first read up on Wikipedia's core policies: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. As such it documents topics in a neutral, verifiable manner. Not all subjects are suitable for inclusion, and the primary criterion for inclusion of a topic is that multiple independent reliable sources have written about the topic in a non-trivial fashion. For example, a feature article in a major urban newspaper or a nationally-published magazine. Conflicts of Interest are best avoided, as they make neutrality difficult.

Parents Centre is quite likely to be notable, but your efforts to create the article have been a little flawed (It is unfortunate that the deleting administrator in May did not have time to respond to your question on his/her talk page).

The current article has no context. It should start with a simple statement of what NZPC is (but that is not the same thing as a mission statement).
Reproducing large chunks of text from the subject's website is not outlawed per se, but it is problematic. There are bots which will detect it as a copyright violation unless content owner (NZPC National executive) goes through the process of sending a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation releasing the rights to that content under one of the acceptable Wikipedia licesnses (which allow unlimited, even comemrcial) re-use. It is also likely to be percieved as being promotional language and hence non-neutral.
Behaviour such as recreation of deleted content (without first obtaining a consensus) could possibly result in your account being blocked.
The Conflict of Interest implied by your username will tend to make anyone reviewing the article more prejudicial.

So, where to? It would be best if an article were written by someone independent. I don't mind helping with that, but it willb e a relatively short article. However, if my assumption is correct, you are well placed to provide me with references. Likely sources such as parenting magazines are seldom republished online and back copies tend not to be held or cataloged by libraries (other than the National Library) - which makes tracking them down well-nigh impossible for an outsider. Please feel free to respond on my talk page. dramatic (talk) 10:12, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]