User talk:Nationalparks

; Archives
	September 6, 2005 – June 21, 2006; June 2006 – August 2011; ; ;

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

File source problem with File:Humpbackrocks.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Humpbackrocks.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:18, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I took this myself and uploaded it well before this policy came into place... Nationalparks (talk) 22:50, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for National Park Travelers Club

On 4 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article National Park Travelers Club, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that members of a club earn a special platinum prize for visiting 394 places in the US? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/National Park Travelers Club.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons

Most of your images have been transferred to the commons. Maybe you upload new ones to there? 71.191.105.26 (talk) 15:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

use of an image in a physical geography textbook

Dear Scott,

I'm a freelance photo researcher working on a geography textbook being published by Pearson Science and the author would like to use this photo in the book: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Trinlake2.JPG

I see you have a creative commons license that allows commercial use, but Pearson prefers if photo sources sign a contract, if possible. We would need printing rights, plus any electronic rights, and all derivatives and ancillaries connected to the book for this edition and all future editions.

Could you please let me know your full name for the credit or if you prefer, it can be Nationalparks or your website, etc. But I would need your name and address for the contract.

You can email me at info@wanderlustphotos.com

This is the book info:

Earth 11e Tarbuck/Lutgens ISBN: 9780321814067 2013

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Kristin

October 26, 2012

-- Kristin Piljay Photo Researcher info@wanderlustphotos.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wanderlustphotos (talk • contribs) 05:41, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of film director and composer collaborations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of film director and composer collaborations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of film director and composer collaborations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. iMatthew / talk 07:11, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Million Dollar Highway

Template:Million Dollar Highway has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 19:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Divide Creek

The article Divide Creek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Creeks typically are not notable, and no references from reliable sources to confirm notability otherwise. The fact that it exists isn't sufficient.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hwy43 (talk) 01:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mmrf.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mmrf.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lixion Avila for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lixion Avila is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lixion Avila until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 22:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nationalparks. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nationalparks. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Pass

Template:Infobox Pass has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox mountain pass. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:43, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eastern Marching Band Association for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eastern Marching Band Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastern Marching Band Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Raymie (t • c) 01:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Musical Arts Conference for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Musical Arts Conference is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musical Arts Conference until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 11:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Into the Storm (2014 film" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Into the Storm (2014 film has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Into the Storm (2014 film until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of the United States National Park System official units for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the United States National Park System official units, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the United States National Park System official units until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]