User talk:Nathanl1192

Hello everyone. Please use the area below to add warnings (although I hope you will never have to) or information! Thanks

Talk to me

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Closedmouth (talk) 09:40, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nathanl1192 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand I recently have been using my account for vandalism, but in the past I have made valuable contributions to this resource. I feel that unblocking me would be a good idea, as I enjoy improving articles, even much so, that before my vandalism streak, I was thinking of applying to become an admin, but I doubt that will happen now. I understand what I have done, even if I do not agree with the block. Please reconsider this move. Sincerely, Nathanl1192 (talk) 00:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per comment below. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I spent an hour looking over your contributions and found one mainspace edit that remains, and it appears your spelling was corrected for that one. Can you point to what you consider some of the "valuable contributions" you have made? Tiderolls 02:29, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nathanl1192 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I use wikipedia well, and usually attempt to make good improvments to articles. I realise that by vandalism streak was wrong, and it will not happen again. I would love to be part of the wikipedia community again. Thanks,Nathanl1192 (talk) 16:05, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no evidence whatsoever of your using wikipedia well; you were asked by Tide rolls to provide examples and have clearly been unable to do so. Nor can I find any.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please stop it

--69.47.197.27 (talk) 21:44, 5 February 2014 (UTC)Guku25 please accept your ban and stop circumventing it with multiple accounts it's just getting annoying and I don't wanna hear they aren't your socks because they are. --69.47.197.27 (talk) 21:44, 5 February 2014 (UTC)Guku25[reply]