User talk:NathanielTheBold/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:NathanielTheBold. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Welcome

Hello, Agnosticraccoon, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- 220.101 (talk) ^\Contribs 18:44, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --220.101 (talk) ^\Contribs 18:47, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Scott (The Office), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:23, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

Your addition to 30 Rock (season 5) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Text copied word-for-word from press release: http://www.thefutoncritic.com/listings/20101020nbc03/ Logical Fuzz (talk) 00:38, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Larry Cedar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Alan Ball, Deadwood, George Miller, Towelhead and Six Feet Under

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Ahmed Best, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stomp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Pilot

Technically, it is consistent just to have the episode name, but when two or three are identical, I think we should help the reader with the parenthetical. Should we discuss this somewhere?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:24, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't disagree, but I do think it should be consistent. So I think either we should have show titles for all episodes (since it's not very clear in general) or we should just make sure to have links to Wikipedia episode lists, specifically directed to that episode title or the season it's in. My two cents. Agnosticraccoon (talk) 04:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

I am going to take this to WP:TV.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jersey Girl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Opting in to VisualEditor

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:17, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Feedback needed on using special characters

Hello. Thank you for using VisualEditor! Having editors use it is the best way for the Wikimedia Foundation to develop it into the best tool it can be.

While we always welcome general feedback (please report any issues in Bugzilla in the "VisualEditor" product or drop your feedback on the central feedback page on MediaWiki.org), the developers are especially interested right now in feedback on the special character inserter. This new tool is used for inserting special characters (including symbols like ₥, IPA pronunciation symbols, mathematics symbols, and characters with diacritics). It is intended to help people whose computers do not have good character inserters. For example, many Mac users prefer to use the extensive "Special Characters..." tool present at the bottom of the Edit menu in all applications or to learn the keyboard shortcuts for characters like ñ and ü.

The current version of the special characters tool in VisualEditor is very simple and very basic. It will be getting a lot of work in the coming weeks and months. It does not contain very many character sets at this time. (The specific character sets can be customized at each Wikipedia, so that each project could have a local version with the characters it wants.) But the developers want your ideas at this early stage about ways that the overall concept could be improved. I would appreciate your input on this question, so please try out the character inserter and tell me what changes to the design would (or would not!) best work for you.

Issues you might consider:

How often do you normally use Wikipedia's character inserters?
Which character sets are useful to you? Should it include all 18 of the character sets provided in the wikitext editor's newer toolbar at the English Wikipedia, the 10 present in the older editor toolbar, or some other combination of character sets?
How many special characters would you like to see at one time?
- Should there be a "priority" or "favorites" section for the 10 or 12 characters that most editors need most often? Is it okay if you need an extra click to go beyond the limited priority set?
- How should the sections be split up? Should they be nested? Ordered?
- How should the sections be navigated? Should there be a drop-down? A nested menu?
The wikitext editor has never included many symbols and characters, like ℗ and ♀. Do you find that you need these missing characters? If the character inserter in VisualEditor includes hundreds or thousands of special characters, will it be overwhelming? How will you find the character you want? What should be done for users without enough space to display more than a few dozen characters?
Should the character inserter be statically available until dismissed? Should it hover near the mouse? Should it go away on every selection or 10 seconds after a selection with no subsequent ones?
Some people believe that the toolbar already has too many options—how would you simplify it?

The developers are open to any thoughts on how the special character inserter can best be developed, even if this requires significant changes. Please leave your views on the central feedback page, or, if you'd prefer, you can contact me directly on my talk page. It would be really helpful if you can tell me how frequently you need to use special characters in your typical editing and what languages or other special characters are important to you.

Thank you again for your work with VisualEditor and for any feedback you can provide. I really do appreciate it.

P.S. You might be interested in the current ideas about improving citations, too. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

ALA awards 2015

Hi there - I see you are working on the ALA Awards that were announced this morning. I was just about to dig into that too. Is there anything that I can help with? KConWiki (talk) 01:34, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Pretty sure there are some awards I didn't get to (like the Geisels)! NathanielTheBold (talk) 01:43, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

OK - I am working on cleaning up some spelling errors w/ the name of the actor Forest Whitaker - After that, I will start in on the ones you didn't hit and try to get those all set today and tomorrow. Maybe after that you could spotcheck my work and I will spotcheck yours? KConWiki (talk) 01:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Your addition to Earwolf has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
In particular, this edit copypasted extensive content from pages such as this and this. Nick Number (talk) 17:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2016

Hi, I'm User:ATinySliver. I've reverted your edit to Alan Rickman. Articles on British subjects use the British English standard, which places closing punctuation outside quote marks. 🖖ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 01:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Noted! NathanielTheBold (talk) 03:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Italics in wikilinks

Hi Nathaniel, thanks for your efforts at keeping film-related articles up-to-date. There is one quirk to your editing, however, that is giving some of the bots a lot of extra work. Put italics outside the wikilink of something to be italicized. Do not create piping where piping is not needed, as it obfuscates what the link is to and is completely unnecessary. Thanks! JesseRafe (talk) 16:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

That seems to be a quirk of visual editor, so I'll try to avoid it. Thanks! NathanielTheBold (talk) 17:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

lol

you are a noughty boy. Nestly, Akhibuz (talk) 15:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

I do like Nestlé chocolate, thank you for asking. NathanielTheBold (talk) 17:34, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (The Most Hated Woman in America) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Most Hated Woman in America, NathanielTheBold!

Wikipedia editor Damibaru just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I read the title first, and thought that this must surely be a vandalism page, or something of that sort. But I was wrong. Lesson learned: Never judge a book (or Wikipedia article) by its cover. Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment on Damibaru's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your many fine edits

and for saving me more times than I can count! Flami72 (talk) 12:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Hey thanks! NathanielTheBold (talk) 21:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Netflix

Hi there! I've noticed you frequently edit on the Netflix originals list, I've removed two films from the "acquired" table, as they seem to have been distributed by Fox Digital onto Netflix, without Netflix actually acquiring the films. Is this okay, I've removed them, or should they be added back? Vmars22 (talk) 21:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Good question. I'm not sure--my criterion is generally whether something has a Netflix logo on it or not. But your methodology seems sound. NathanielTheBold (talk) 22:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

I double checked the references and it doesn't say anything about Netflix acquiring, just Fox Digital exclusively releasing it on Netflix. Also, I've removed a bunch of nomination awards included on the Rachel Weisz article, is that okay as well? :) Vmars22 (talk) 22:18, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi there! I was reverted again on the Netflix article, for putting "Audrie and Daisy" in the originals section. The film is listed on Netflix's PR website as an "original film", a third party hasn't signed on to the film, so it'll be billed as original. Shouldn't it be removed from acquisitions or stay in acquisitions? Vmars22 (talk) 20:58, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

I think you're right about this -- anything billed as a Netflix original shouldn't be listed as an acquisition. Though I was reverted when I tried to edit the article to reflect that for The Little Prince. NathanielTheBold (talk) 18:13, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080117/FEATURES/660746609/1006/NEWS "News"] gazettonline, January 14, 2008] {{wayback|url=http://www.gazetteonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080117/FEATURES/660746609/
in production at Two River Theater in Red Bank, N.J. The production is led my an all male cast (Paul Castree, Eddie Cooper, Kevin Isola, David Josefsberg, Max Kumangai, Graham Rowat, Manny Stark,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:26, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Jon Hamm

Could you take a look at his article when you get a chance? A selection of his opinions has been added. Though sourced, they don't appear particularly notable, and seems to amount to a trivia section. Thanks. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 17:37, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, NathanielTheBold. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Mary Holland (actress)

Hi, I'm Teblick. NathanielTheBold, thanks for creating Mary Holland (actress)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Can you add her birth date? That is usually a key item in a biography? Also, please use the full name of UCB on first reference. Many readers may not know what the initials represent.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Eddie Blick (talk) 15:12, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Will look into it, thanks! NathanielTheBold (talk) 04:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Episode ix

You're right it isn't dated which is why I created a tba section for it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FCC8:A312:100:906C:9432:30C9:1EE9 (talk) 12:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

film production prohibits NAVBOX linking?

With regard to this edit, is there a guideline or manual that says not to link to an article section from a navigation template if the film has not yet begun filming? — fourthords | =Λ= | 15:06, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Just wanna say that you're awesome dude

I've been campaigning for the Underwater draft to be moved into main space. It confused me as to why it hadn't already been there, considering the fact that filming happened and wrapped months ago. So thanks for fixing that. Also, thanks for fixing up my Wikipedia article for Every Day! I really apprieciate it! If you wouldn't mind, I'd love if you'd take a look at my most recent Wikipedia article, Teen Spirit and make sure it's all neat and tidy. The links aren't formatted perfectly, so that's one thing that needs to be fixed up. Thanks! TheMovieGuy TheMovieGuy (talk) 15:13, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Sure, I'll take a look! NathanielTheBold (talk) 23:14, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Untitled Terrence Malick project listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Terrence Malick project. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled Terrence Malick project redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:19, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, NathanielTheBold. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Lauren Ambrose, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 12:59, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Inquiry from The Washington Post

Hi there,

My name is Sonia, and I write for The Washington Post. I'm interested in pursuing a story about Wikipedia users who update/edit pages detailing specific histories of the Academy Awards (e.g. "List of black Academy Award winners and nominees," "90th Academy Awards"). I believe you might have edited a similar page recently, perhaps during the ceremony. People who are simply curious often end up on these informative pages, and I believe our readers might find it interesting to hear the story behind the quick edits — are there some Wikipedia users who wait for the awards to be announced and then update the pages immediately? How do you keep track of all the history? And so on.

If you'd be interested in chatting with me, please let me know as soon as possible. I can be reached at sonia.rao@washpost.com.

Thanks! Sonia

Soniarao23 (talk) 16:36, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

The Promise (2017 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Promise (2017 film). Since you had some involvement with the The Promise (2017 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paul_012 (talk) 17:47, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Flag

Hi, NathanielTheBold.
I've noticed that you are an AfC reviewer but don't yet have the New Page Reviewer flag. Would you please consider heading over to PERM and requesting it? (check the flag requirements HERE)
As part of a larger plan to increase cooperation between New Page Patrol and Articles for creation, we are trying to get as many of the active AfC reviewers as possible under the NPR user flag (per this discussion). Unlike the AfC request list, the NPR flag carries no obligation to review new articles, so I'm not asking you to help out at New Page Patrol if you don't want to, just to request the flag.
Of course, if it is something you would be interested in, you can have a look at the NPP tutorial. Please mention that you are an active AfC reviewer in your application.
Cheers and thanks for helping out at AfC, — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Untitled A.A. Milne Project

A tag has been placed on Untitled A.A. Milne Project requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Redirect leftover from before project had a title. Variation already discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_April_23#Untitled_Deadpool_Sequel

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --wooden superman 14:44, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Untitled Alfonso Cuarón/Mexico City project listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Alfonso Cuarón/Mexico City project. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled Alfonso Cuarón/Mexico City project redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --wooden superman 10:28, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Patrick Stewart, Roles and Awards

I noticed you were a frequent editor of this page:

Proposed deletion of Patrick Stewart, roles and awards

The article Patrick Stewart, roles and awards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I posted in the talk page 4 months ago why this is a separate article from Patrick Stewart. It contains largely redundant information. The unique information (Theater and Awards sections) have been moved to the Patrick Stewart page. Additionally, users of Wikipedia probably aren't going to search for this article as a topic, but will most likely search for Patrick Stewart and expect this information to be there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarHOG (Talk) 14:16, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, NathanielTheBold. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Ophelia (upcoming film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ophelia (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Ophelia (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Inner City (upcoming film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inner City (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Inner City (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Stuck (upcoming film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stuck (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Stuck (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:54, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Sunset (upcoming film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sunset (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Sunset (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:48, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Stockholm (upcoming film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stockholm (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Stockholm (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Only You (upcoming film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Only You (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Only You (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

West Side Story (2019 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect West Side Story (2019 film). Since you had some involvement with the West Side Story (2019 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 20:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Aladdin (upcoming Disney film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aladdin (upcoming Disney film). Since you had some involvement with the Aladdin (upcoming Disney film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:18, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Deadwood (upcoming film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Deadwood (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Deadwood (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 13:34, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

Hey man. Is there any way to unlock the editing on that page? There's some stuff that's incorrect on there. If not, can you tell me how long it will be locked for? Thank you. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 00:12, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Diahann Carroll

On 7 October 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Diahann Carroll, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:34, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Reprisal (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 20:14, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Mendes and Scorsese

That was a nice edit on Mendes from yesterday. The other edit you did on Scorsese looks like an update on the edit I did a few days ago which merged an old section into his career section, giving consideration to how Scorsese goes about marketing his 'new' and potential projects. There is a significant question as to whether these projects should be listed in detail, especially when they are compared to projects that are actually in the filming phase or already fully financed. I think it would be nice to see this go to Talk on the Scorsese page first, and possibly you could temporarily reverse your currently pending edit until some discussion takes place: for example, should we wait for actual filming to be starting on new films in order to include it in the article, or does the full financing for the film in place mean it can be included in the article, would it be better in certain circumstances to keep preliminary discussions on the sibling film articles until filming actually starts, etc. There seem to be good reasons to start Talk given that there are many editors who have put Scorsese on their watch list. Could we temporarily keep the current outline without an "Upcoming projects" section, at least until a little Talk page discussion takes place? CodexJustin (talk) 16:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Sure, feel free to do so. I'll try to remember to weigh in on the discussion. NathanielTheBold (talk) 19:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Hollywood (2020 TV series)

This article was probably moved to mainspace too soon, as currently all of the citations are still rather routine pre-release press. I'm letting it through per WP:NOTBURO, since it looks like there's enough big-name actors and crew attached to the show such that it will almost certainly become notable once it airs. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

"Greed (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greed (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Greed (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 20:51, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hey, can you please use edit summaries when editing? BOVINEBOY2008 22:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Table

Hi! I'm sorry to bother you, but I recently created an article Regina K. Scully, the table seems to be broken and I'm not sure how to fix it. Would you mind taking a look? Cinemacriterion (talk) 20:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Hopefully it's fine now! NathanielTheBold (talk) 20:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Luca (Pixar film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luca (Pixar film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca (Pixar film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

"Palm Springs (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Palm Springs (upcoming film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 5#Palm Springs (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 14:17, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Hi, can you please take more care when you edit? Your recent edit at Helen McCrory reverted part of my edit. Abbyjjjj96 (talk)

"Untitled Kevin Macdonald project" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Untitled Kevin Macdonald project. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 6#Untitled Kevin Macdonald project until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:36, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

WP:CURLY

When citing sources, please look for and replace WP:CURLY apostrophes with normal ones. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 11:43, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Sure! NathanielTheBold (talk) 16:18, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:NathanielTheBold. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1