User talk:Nataev/Archive 4
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nataev. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Sorry I've been so slow to respond on Chust! Nice work expanding. Would you be interested in improving Namangan? Needs sourcing first. Happy to help with it, but if I'm being lazy give me a kick :-]♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi there! Sure, I'll be more than happy to work on that article! Let me find some sources first. Then I'll expand the article. Actually since these topics are largely overlooked on the English Wikipedia, I should thank you for showing interest in them! Nataev talk 11:47, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, but the Uzbek encyclopedia is inaccurate on the distance from Tashkent, see here, it's 290km. I'm presuming that at one time that was the distance by road until a more direct route was created.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I see. It's hard to believe that the distance given in the Uzbek Soviet Encyclopedia is inaccurate. Maybe back then (in the 1970s) there was a different route connecting Tashkent and Namangan. Nataev talk 08:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Haha, edit conflict! It looks we both came to the same conclusion! Nataev talk
- Do you speak Russian? There's quite a bit of material on Russian wiki. Ezhiki always says to ignore Russian wiki but if it can be translated and then sourced reliably it should be OK.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I do. Geography articles on the Russian Wikipedia are quite good. I'll take a look. Nataev talk 08:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Do you speak Russian? There's quite a bit of material on Russian wiki. Ezhiki always says to ignore Russian wiki but if it can be translated and then sourced reliably it should be OK.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Haha, edit conflict! It looks we both came to the same conclusion! Nataev talk
Andijan next?♦ Dr. Blofeld
- OK! :) Nataev talk 04:38, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Nice one. Yes, they're not very good on average, all the more reason why work is needed :-)!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:39, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, you can say that again! Nataev talk 11:43, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Angren, Uzbekistan next? List of Uzbekistani films could also do with updating and putting in table format like List of American films of 1940.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:13, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Okey-dokey! Nataev talk 10:00, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
A page you started (Community Security Initiative) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Community Security Initiative, Nataev!
Wikipedia editor Wbm1058 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you for creating this article. I added it to Category:Government of Kyrgyzstan for now, as there is not yet any government subcategory for police.
To reply, leave a comment on Wbm1058's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
- OK, thanks! Nataev talk 10:17, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
What you have done for those Uzbekistan/Kyrgyzstan articles is very important, and we all owe you our thanks. Drmies (talk) 17:15, 2 November 2014 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much indeed! :) Nataev talk 04:34, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Eurasian Economic Union
Hello Nataev, the Eurasian Economic Union will launch on January 1 2015 with Kyrgyzstan, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia as its members states. Tajikistan may join in the future. As you are interested in Central Asia, if I may I would like to ask you to assess or contribute to the article (by correcting any mistakes) if you have the time and wish to do so. We would like the article to be ranked as a Good Article (possibly featured) and be in perfect state before January 1. (This is purely voluntary although any help will be greatly appreciated).
Many thanks —Mentoroso (talk) 19:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Interesting topic! I'll take a look. Nataev talk 06:06, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hey Nataev, thanks for your interest! At this point we're just looking for a volunteer that can assess the article so that we can get it ranked as a good article. Also people that can improve it so that it can better fit the featured article criteria. Thanks for your corrections (didn't realise till you pointed them out!) Cheers —Mentoroso (talk) 22:11, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- OK, sounds good. I'll take a closer look the article next week. I must say it's going to take a lot of time! But the topic is very interesting for me. Nataev talk 16:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nataev. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |