User talk:Nataev/Archive 11

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nataev. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

Coordinators and help needed

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap fillers - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Uzbek alphabet

(No, I don't speak Uzbek).

Hi. I'm a bit confused by our article. For example, in the lead we say "it has been officially written in the Latin script since 1992", but then go on to detail how in the years since Uzbek has been written in Cyrillic instead of Latin. E.g. "Since 2004, some official websites have switched over to using the Latin script", which suggests that between 1992 and 2004 Uzbek was officially written in Cyrillic, and that since 2004 it has only partially been written in Latin.

Will you update the article with the results of the public discussion?

One reason I've been trying to figure out what's going on is that I've been trying to typeset something in Uzbek, and keep coming across contradictory reports of what the orthography is. I take it that for now, it's best to typeset Uzbek text in the 1995 alphabet?

Also, are there any other orthographic changes (e.g. different analyses of what the vowels are, as in the Kazakh reforms), or is the reform simply a matter of blindly substituting ch, sh, gʻ, oʻ with ç, ş, ḡ, ō?

Also, the two sources you provide contradict one another. The Russian source says that ғ, ў are to be ḡ, ō, but the English source says they are to be ǵ, ó. Do we know one is wrong, or do they reflect a change in the proposal?

Thanks, — kwami (talk) 05:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I've changed the lead. Basically, Uzbekistan has been struggling to fully switch to Latin. As for the public discussion, I'm skeptical about it. Word has it that the current president has put a hold on revising the alphabet once again due to two reasons: it's going to be expensive, and Mother Russia isn't too happy about this whole thing. Moreover, only 37 people have commented so far. People have just grown tired of this crap and don't care about it anymore. To make things worse, in 2013 a group of smartasses (I'm pretty sure these are the same people who have been proposing replacing ch, sh, gʻ, oʻ with ç, ş, ḡ, ō since 2018) published a new orthographic dictionary in Latin and introducied some new rules. Among other things, they proposed spelling sentabr (1995 rule) as sentyabr. But these rules haven't been officially endorsed.

And yes, the reforms primarily concern the absurd okina-like symbols. Supposedly Karimov didn't want the Uzbek alphabet to be too similar to Turkish, so he insisted that the local linguists come up with unique symbols. And come up with unique symbols they did. So unique that an absolute majority of 30 or so million Uzbeks don't know or care about the difference between ʻ and ʼ. But yes, the 1995 alphabet and orthography are still in force.

As for the two sources, that's what happens and when people who don't actually speak the language report. The English version is obviously wrong. Nataev ^talk 07:24, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

It looks like the Latin orthography is sometimes more than just a transliteration of the Cyrillic. Like oktabr -- is that mostly that Russian loans are spelled as in Russian in Cyrillic, but as they're pronounced in Latin? I went through a paragraph, and every word of a blind transliteration agreed with with the 1999 Cyrillic-Latin lexicon you linked to (even the proper name Navoiy), so it would seem there aren't many irregularities. — kwami (talk) 11:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Yes, the Latin orthography has a few (pretty dumb) rules. For instance, circus is spelled цирк in Cyrillic, but sirk in Latin. Basically, they're trying hard to get rid of Russian influence (the letter ц in this specific case). However, most people spell Jack as Jek in the Uzbek Latin script. Basically, they take local geographical names in countries where a Latin alphabet is used or names originally written in a Latin script, see the Russian spelling in Cyrillic, and then write the word in Latin. Rather like Azerbaijanis. Nataev ^talk 04:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Kwamikagami, it seems they're gonna change the alphabet after all. Nataev ^talk 09:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! So, a Turkish ğ, but the article contradicts itself on whether the vowel will be ō or õ. We'll see -- I'm assuming no guarantee the bill will pass. At least the changes are minimal enough that it shouldn't be a problem for people to read both.

I'd assume that ⟨ñ⟩ is only for when it's a single consonant, and that final -n + dative -ga would still be spelled ⟨ng⟩, e.g. tomonga, menga? — kwami (talk) 10:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

The vowel for sure will be õ, not ō. It's a typo or they're simply quoting their anonymous source. You're right on ⟨ñ⟩, I think. It's going to create a lot of confusion. But yes, until the proposed changes are signed into law, there's no need to worry too much about them now. Nataev ^talk 06:00, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap filler - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)