User talk:NatAust

This is NatAust's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jarrah Honey (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Beachweak was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many sections of this article such as the "production" section and the "characteristics" section either need more citations in general or more reliable citations. I have a suspicion some of this is written by a large language model, and I would recommend the "characteristics" and "uses" sections especially to be rewritten or adjusted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jarrah Honey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Beachweak (talk) 11:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NatAust! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Beachweak (talk) 11:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Hello NatAust,

I appreciate the effort that you have put into adding information about honeys in eucalypt species, but all information added to a Wikipedia article must be referenced, preferably with an inline citation. WP:REFB is a good place to start, and there is more detailed information at WP:CS. I would be happy to help you with your work here. Gderrin (talk) 12:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jarrah Honey (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jarrah Honey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:05, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for the feedback.

Could you please provide further feedback on what additional information you would like me to add to make this an acceptable article?

Following the previous rejection, I believe that I have included extensive peer reviewed articles and sources for fullness.

I would appreciate some guidance to be able to what you are looking for as I am an expert in this field and my response is to add more detail which I have a feeling is the wrong direction!

Thank you,

Natalie 86.98.56.169 (talk) 11:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]