User talk:Nastradumas 2001

Welcome!

A cartoon centipede reads books and types on a laptop. — The Wikipede and the Picture Tutorial. *(image credit)*

Welcome!

Hello, Nastradumas 2001, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Nas, show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...

...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process - at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. JesseRafe JesseRafe (talk) 15:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Miami Heat, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. JesseRafe (talk) 15:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Summary style

Welcome to Wikipedia. I see that some of your contributions have been reverted by others. You may not be aware, but many articles on Wikipedia are written in summary style. Where a high level article like San Antonio Spurs contains very high level information, while season details are handled in lower-level articles like 2015–16 San Antonio Spurs season. Hope this helps with your selection of which articles you choose to improve. Welcome again.—Bagumba (talk) 17:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Compton (album) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nastradumas 2001/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:11, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nastradumas 2001, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:11, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Compton (album) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nastradumas 2001/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 19:28, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Compton (album) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nastradumas 2001/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Happysailor ^(Talk) 19:59, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tayshaun Prince

Please do not add information prematurely, as you did to Tayshaun Prince. There was a note specifically saying "Wait until an official team announcement", of which there hasn't been. Next time, please read the note, and wait until an official announcement from the team. Thanks. Miamiheat631 (talk) 12:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Not These Niggaz Again (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Not These Niggaz Again and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 09:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Not These Niggaz Again (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Not These Niggaz Again and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Happysailor ^(Talk) 18:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Death Row Records may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*Kurupt(2002-2005

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The D.O.C.

added links pointing to Helter Skelter and Deuce

Rihanna

added a link pointing to Travis Scott

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Warren G, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 17:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Not These Niggaz Again (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Orduin was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Not These Niggaz Again and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Orduin ^Discuss 20:46, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

No Way Out 2

added links pointing to No Way Out and American

Last Train to Paris

added a link pointing to Press Play

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Leandro Barbosa appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 19:54, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bad Boy Records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bow Wow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Not These Niggaz Again

Hello, Nastradumas 2001. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Not These Niggaz Again".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 10:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nastradumas 2001. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm 2602:306:3357:BA0:D190:FC35:4186:AA33. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Lox have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2602:306:3357:BA0:D190:FC35:4186:AA33 (talk) 01:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Numbered lists

Hi there. I noticed your edits on the Faith Evans album. I just thought you should know there is a way to make a numbered list. just put a # sign before every song title, no need to include the number or double space them. I have fixed it on the Faith album so if you need a visual, please check it out. Thanks. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 04:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The King & I

Letting you know I've redirected The King and I (Faith Evans album) as it had only one source and fails WP:NALBUMS. One source cannot sustain an article with a more complex track listing and unsourced claims, and does not make it notable. The cover art also has the album title as The King & I and Evans is equally credited along with The Notorious B.I.G., so if anything it should be recreated at The King & I (Faith Evans and The Notorious B.I.G. album) (when more sources can be found) instead. Ss 112 08:54, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Love Me No More (Jim Jones Song)

Hello, Nastradumas 2001,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Love Me No More (Jim Jones Song) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Me No More (Jim Jones Song) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Eddie Blick (talk) 02:10, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fat Joe, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Redemption of the Beast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DMX. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Major Key (album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Major Key (album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Major Key (album). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 17:58, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic talk! 14:40, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Wins & Losses (album)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Wins & Losses (album), Nastradumas 2001!

Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Meatsgains (talk) 02:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Roc Nation. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Derrick Rose. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 03:23, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:42, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Label years

These aren't appropriate to include in infoboxes per Template:Infobox musical artist#label, so please desist from adding them. Also, per WP:Manual of Style#Dashes, don't use hyphens (-) when you really mean to use dashes (–) for ranges and such. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Views (album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Doggy Style Records. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dwyane Wade. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 11:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The E.P. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The E.P. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The E.P. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dysklyver 21:53, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfD tags

Don't remove AfD tags, please. Go to the deletion discussion and talk about it. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with The E.P.. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:38, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Make America Crip Again

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Make America Crip Again requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB (talk) 00:59, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of M.A.C.A.

Hello Nastradumas 2001,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged M.A.C.A. for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains (talk) 01:06, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages you created yourself. Also, I'd suggest creating drafts in your WP:SANDBOX before uploading to the mainspace. This prevents deletion tags from being prematurely added to pages you create. Meatsgains (talk) 01:27, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

M.A.C.A. has again been redirected to Make America Crip Again. As mentioned before, it is just a copypaste of the latter article that itself has virtually zero content. It can be reinstated once the single/EP charts or gains significant publicity. Thank you for your understanding. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 21:33, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of More Money, More Cash, More Hoes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on More Money, More Cash, More Hoes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Doggy Style Records. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Come Home with Me. Rob van vee 07:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Compton

1: There is an ongoing discussion on the article's talk page as mentioned in the note you chose to delete regarding this issue. At Wikipedia we discuss things until consensus is reached in a civil manner, unlike your edit summery here.

2: If you continue to make such personal attacks you will be reported to ANI. Rob van vee 08:05, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nastradumas 2001. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello. Can you review or help edit my article on Blac Youngsta? Chicksfromvenus (talk) 04:49, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Guess Who's Coming To Dinner? (Fat Killahz album)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Guess Who's Coming To Dinner? (Fat Killahz album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:59, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 03:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of No Way Out 2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article No Way Out 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Way Out 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:19, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dwight Howard. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 17:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This marks the third block for the same pattern of behavior. As this is a collaborative environment, communication is required. Despite dozens of attempts by various members of the community to reach out to you regarding your persistent additions of unsourced content, you have made no effort to respond and ignored them all, for many years now. The next block will be indefinite. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at G-Unit. Rob van vee 05:42, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption, refusal to discuss.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I should be unblocked simply because I was helping the community. If I add content without a source, it’s because I don’t have the time at that moment to do so but I do my research upon the topic before adding it to the page Nastradumas 2001 (talk) 05:05, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nastradumas 2001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because I kept adding information that was unsourced. This last block was indefinite with no timeline of me coming back. I apologize for not adding the sources that does not back up my edits. The information that I added is 100% accurate. I have never put any information that's not true. Most times, my information that I added to the wiki page gets deleted just to be put back by a another Wikipedia editor which is completely unfair. But I do see where I went wrong, I'd be sure to add sources to the content I add. This account has been dormant for 3 months now and I would hate for the amount of time and effort I put into these efforts to go down the drain. Thank you for understanding.

Decline reason:

No. You've been engaging in block evasion. Clearly, you have no intention of abiding by our rules. Yamla (talk) 18:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nastradumas 2001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, I admit I was engaging in block evasion. I don't have no excuse to defend my action. I was anxious to start editing again so I made a new account. I was already considering making a new account because I didn't like the 'Nastradumas' name anymore.

Decline reason:

This is not a WP:GAB-compliant appeal. Please do not use the unblock template to reply to admin questions and comments.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock discussion

You've had many blocks for this. Why is now different? You say you added true information, but where did you get the information? Why not just cite your source? Please read Wikipedia:Citing_sources and explain how you will use this resource in the future. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:16, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nastradumas 2001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

After months of being away and rereading the Wikipedia:Citing_sources and reading the community guidelines multiple times, I know how important it is to cite the sources for the information I add to a page. I apologize for not doing so in the past. I'll make sure it won't happen again so I won't end up in a another incident like now. You guys have really stressed the importance of citing sources and I won't add information without it be cited first.

Decline reason:

Per Yamla, below - you now also need to address your block evasion before we will unblock you. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This does not address your violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE, as Big Baller Cam (talk · contribs), two months ago. --Yamla (talk) 16:40, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]