User talk:Nash Yang

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nash Yang (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don’t know why I’m blocked from editing on Wikipedia. I’m suspected of sockpuppetry but there’s no evidence of that I am aware of. But if I did do something wrong let me know. I’m here to talk about it. I’m not here vandalize or do anything wrong so if I made a mistake again let me know.

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, which means that there is technical evidence to support it(evidence that only checkusers are permitted to see). If you are not a sockpuppet, you will need to explain why technical evidence would indicate otherwise. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nash Yang (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what evidence? Where? You need to show me. Unless you have good reason to block me this is unfair. Proof? I need to see because it seems like youre falsely accusing me of something i didnt do

Decline reason:

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bcbryar643/Archive. That's the extent we'll share with you. Yamla (talk) 13:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nash Yang (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason: nope. Still don't see it. I looked over all the other account that were "sockpuppeted" and we rarely share nothing in common. I spent majority of my time on wikipedia editing Down With Webster page and when I look at the other account contribution, they never worked on it. Any other reason why I have been blocked?

Decline reason:

You're blocked for abusing multiple accounts, based on technical evidence from system logs. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nash Yang (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason: How though? How am I abusing multiple accounts? Where is the "techinal evidence". Stop giving me vague answers and actually explain the reasoning. You keep making me confused and frustrated.

Decline reason:

Since you're still demanding that we convince you that you're a sock puppet instead of explaining why we should unblock you, I've revoked your talk page access. Read through WP:GAB before you make another unblock request via WP:UTRS. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS ban

UTRS appeal #40881 User is banned from UTRS. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:08, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]