Jump to content

User talk:Naseer n nasrat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unblocked

[edit]

You have been unblocked based on CU findings of 28 Nov 2007, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/NisarKand#NisarKand. RlevseTalk 02:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is not NisarKand. It is actually a sock of another banned user: user: Khampalak (Khampalak means Doggy style).


and if you click on khampalak, it says that khampalak is a puppet of NisarKand. So If I am not a Puppet of NisarKand then since NisarKand is khampalak, I am also not khampalak.

I am not a sock puppet of anybody. Leave me alone.

We already know that Nisarkand and Khampalak are 2 different people with very different views. NisarKand is a proud Pashtun but he does not interfere with other ethnic group's identity. That is because NisarKand can speak Pashto and knows his own identity. Khampalak on the other hand is probably Etemadi tribe (his interest in Etamadi articles) and is definitely a Mohammedzai (his defence of Nadir Khan and Zahir Khan). They are Persianized and do not know Pashto and so in order to justify this they need to impose the word Afghan on everything to do with Afghanistan so that they have something that relates them to Farsi language, history, and culture.
Both are very hateful and racist against Tajiks though.


Well I am not hatefull towards any ethnicity, I have nothing to do with those racist people. and if you must know I am Hazara and I have never heard of Etemadi, I don't know what that is, this is the first time I have heard of it.

It is a Pashtun tribe. There was a former Prime Minister from that tribe and currently there is a singer from that tribe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KabuliNewMusician (talkcontribs) 04:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naseer n Nasrat.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Naseer n Nasrat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 20:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]