User talk:Nascentatheist/Archive2

Archived Talk Pages

Gastrich's latest petition

It is my belief that some of the sock puppets aren't Gastrich. I have reason to believe that User:Hugo the Hippo is a sock puppet of banned user User_talk:Bible John. This in no way excuses Gastrich's behavior, and in fact given his history the accusation is justified, but pointing out that his claim that he is being framed isn't entirely false. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 21:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Either way, taunting Gastrich was not helping, so I'd ask Nascentatheist not to do so again. Guy (Help!) 17:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I did not view my comments as "taunting," but I can understand that the harmony of the community is important, just as I can understand other viewpoints. I confess that I thought that what I had to say after the administrator's decision would be my last on the matter, but I did feel compelled to not only defend myself against false accusations, but to act on behalf of the community, as all editors do, to Jason's disruptive comments and insertion of his attack group link. I would actually much prefer to edit elsewhere. I suppose I, too, got caught up, as many of us do when these things happen. My apologies. - Nascentatheist 17:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalized talk page

I have removed a false accusation from IP 76.6.113.149 [1]. Both the Wikipedia user page for me and the associated talk page were vandalized. This was probably Jason Gastrich, who discovered that yet another of his domains has been black-listed. It is, after all, nothing more than an attack site reference to his Google hate group. Jason does not have the courage to post his accusations in forums in which they can be rebutted, and now has resorted to posting from anonymous IPs since he has been fully banned from Wikipedia. He continues to show us that his banning is completely justified. - Nascentatheist 13:50, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

Your conduct on Liberty University is mentioned here --D_arkF_alls ^talk 09:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Hoffman

You have a fair point, but since I hadn't actually noticed you r comments, and judged on behaviour, and Moreschi and several other outsiders to the debate suggested that I was being too lenient when I first went with the restricted ban, I think this one has a bit more consensus than I'd be willing to overrule. Adam Cuerden ^talk 09:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Wild Assumptions/Taking You Seriously

What evidence do you have that User:CottonMather is a sockpuppet of Jason Gastrich? You're acting like the little boy that cried wolf. How is anyone supposed to take your contributions seriously when you quickly label people who don't agree with you "Jason Gastrich sockpuppets"? Have you ever considered posting a message on CottonMather's talk page or approaching this situation in a more sensible way? I hope I'm not labeled as a sockpuppet for challenging your infinite wisdom. --Really33 04:50, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jason. You've been banned, you know. Your response above only provides more evidence that Really33 is just another sock-puppet, with phrases such as "wild assumptions" and presumptions about how others would react. All of that is characteristic. I suspect your own identity because your actions clearly bring up a couple of questions: Who is CottonMather to you? How is it that you would react in such a way to my designation of him/her as a sock-puppet? Why is it a problem for you and why, with your first edits, would it concern you? These are things that give any rational person good cause to view you as a sock-puppet. - Nascentatheist 04:55, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You don't know my real name, so don't pretend, son. Don't think so much. You aint that smart. Someone needs to reel you in, boy. You have no proof that User:CottonMather is Jason. Do you? No, you don't and you're slandering Jason's good name because you hate him. Do everyone a favor and get the hell out of here. You have no business going anywhere near Christian entries because of your obvious handicap. Run along little boy. Run along. By the way, nobody believes you aren't Dave Horn. Kudos on getting the link banned that exposes you, though. --Really33 05:01, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Jason, the instant you decided to post your accusations again, engage in personal attack and presumptive demeaning language, and the characteristic talk of "hating" Jason, accusations of slander, and talk of "Christian entries" in Wikipedia because of a "handicap" (being an atheist?), you gave the game away even more. - Nascentatheist 05:03, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]