Jump to content

User talk:Nascarfan2016

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Nascarfan2016! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:31, Tuesday, May 31, 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Nascarfan2016! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:50, Tuesday, May 31, 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! – Nascar1996 (talkcont) 15:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Lagasse Jr.

[edit]

Hi! Your contributions to Scott Lagasse Jr. were deleted alongside another 100 edits because portions of the article were tainted with copyright violations. Wikipedia does not accept copied material from other websites. Furthermore, I removed some of the achievements you added because they were not notable to be included in the infobox. Two ARCA wins is hardly notable for the section, and pole positions are not included unless it was a record. I retained the championships and the Rookie of the Year award (which I moved to the awards section). Other contributions you made to the article that were not copyvio appeared to be spammy and did not have a neutral point of view.

Some issues that I noticed is the way you linked certain words and phrases to external websites for reference. Instead of linking them with [ ], you should instead use <ref></ref>, and follow Wikipedia's preferred method of citing sources. Regarding the pictures you uploaded, do you know where you came across them? Did you take the pictures yourself or did you find them online somewhere? – Nascar1996 (talkcont) 17:49, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nascarfan2016. You have new messages at Nascar1996's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

First of all, thank you so much for the help! I really do appreciate it. I'm guessing, as you can tell, I am new to this, but I happen to know Scotty and his family pretty well, and thought I would try to update it for them, hence the bias tone or non neutral point of view. I will take redo and work on it some more. Also, I now understand the ARCA wins and poles.

And my friend Ralph took those pictures and gave me permission to use them.

Again, I really appreciate the help, and hopefully I can make this page 100% complete, and I know I can with your help!

Thanks Nascar1996

Nascarfan2016 (talk) 19:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You probably should read Wikipedia's policies of a conflict of interest, which means you are contributing to Wikipedia about a friend or family member, etc. Conflicts of interest editing is discouraged. – Nascar1996 (talkcont) 20:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately Wikipedia cannot accept information based on a personal friend's say-so; our content, particularly about living persons, must be independently verifiable from reliable published sources such as newspapers or reputable magazines. I'm sure you'll agree it would set a very bad precedent if we accepted information on the basis of "Trust me, it's true!"
Regarding the images, what exactly did the permission you got entail? Wikipedia considers an image non-free (and thus, with some exceptions that do not apply here, unsuitable) unless the copyright holder has released it under a free license that allows everybody to re-use and modify the image for any purpose, including commercial purposes. According to the tags you provided at the Wikimedia Commons, those images are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 license, which indeed is a free license. However, we'll need confirmation that Ralph Smith is indeed ok with that license. Please take a look at WP:Requesting copyright permission for the necessary steps. Huon (talk) 21:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]