User talk:Naruyoko

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Naruyoko! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

-- 07:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Tilde

Thank you for being more specific about your citation concerns and doing it right this time. Of course the next thing to think about is - what happens if nobody responds to these requests in the next week or so? The short answer is that you have just volunteered to hunt for evidence that confirms (or denies!) the assertion and provide the citations yourself. Golden rule of Wikipedia: "if you want anything done properly around here, you have to do it yourself". . 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 23:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm A09. An edit you recently made to Google Translate seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. A09|(talk) 17:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, it was meant to be a genuine edit, but I missed that it broke a heading and forgot to review my changes. I have redone it without breaking it. Thank you for notifying. Naruyoko (talk) 20:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tilde: dubious existing text

First and foremost, I have no expertise whatever in the usage of tilde that your edits address, so this is a generic comment that could apply to any article. That rubric out of the way, some thoughts:

generally when some existing text is uncited and conflicts with a reliable source, I would just delete the existing text. But as the Reimer source is not formally published, I agree that some delay is merited
nevertheless, rather than the simple {{citation needed}} that you applied, I would have gone straight to {{dubious}}.
- if you agree and decide to do it, then first you will need to create a new section at talk:tilde called something like "Dubious text at #Abbreviation" (ugly! but it doesn't really matter what you call it as it is just a talk page item). For the long explanation of what to do, see template:dubious.
- It would be diplomatic to leave a message at talk:Scribal abbreviation to say something simple like "There is a discussion at talk:Tilde#Dubious text at #Abbreviation which may be of interest to editors of this article."

If a defence of the existing text is not offered within a week or so, then just delete it. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 11:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for pointing me to next actions. I read the template documentation for {{Dubious}}, but it says it is for information that is sourced. The original assertions did not have citations, so it does not seem applicable. -- Naruyoko (talk) 17:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are of course correct. I just knew what it said and didn't bother to check. So give it a week and then chop it if no-one defends it. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Also, I finally made talk page edits as suggested. --Naruyoko (talk) 02:26, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sub-referencing: Request for feedback

Hello I’m Johannes from the WMDE Technical Wishes team. Four months ago, we reached out to the community to discuss the new sub-referencing feature we are currently working on. Thank you to everyone who shared their thoughts and feedback on m:Talk:WMDE Technical Wishes/Sub-referencing or in local village pump discussions!

We would like to ask for your perspective again, because we’ve made changes to the wikitext syntax of sub-referencing, based on the feedback we’ve received and because it’s the only viable way of dealing with some technical limitations. Please visit m:Talk:WMDE Technical Wishes/Sub-referencing#Request for feedback to read more about our approach for inline sub-referencing and share your thoughts. Thanks for your effort!

PS: You are receiving this message, because you signed-up to our sub-referencing newsletter. If you don't want to receive further updates, just remove your name from the list.

Johannes Richter (WMDE) (talk) 15:07, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]