User talk:NannetteKnowsMen

Welcome!

Hello, NannetteKnowsMen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Yunshui ^雲_水 07:42, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Agony Element™ (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Agony Element™ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Agony Element™, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 08:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, NannetteKnowsMen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 08:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nannette LaRee Hernandez (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nihlus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nannette LaRee Hernandez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nannette LaRee Hernandez, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nihlus 09:44, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Legal threats are prohibited at Wikipedia

Hello NannetteKnowsMen, legal threats are completely prohibited on Wikipedia; please see WP:No legal threats. I have reported your threat to ANI, since it is completely inappropriate: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Legal_threats_from_NannetteKnowsMen. MatthewVanitas (talk) 09:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, NannetteKnowsMen. You have new messages at MatthewVanitas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:NannetteKnowsMen

A tag has been placed on User:NannetteKnowsMen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 10:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --NannetteKnowsMen (talk) 10:53, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

I am being harassed by 'Reviewer'MatthewVanitas. I have filed a Complaint against him with Wikipedia.

≠== Contested deletion ==

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --NannetteKnowsMen (talk) 11:01, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Also, all you have to do is Google me to see that EVERYTHING on this page, is 100% ACCURATE. Thank you.

But it should not be on WP per WP:NOTADVERTISING. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

OMG how is stating WHO I AM AND WHAT I DO ADVERTSING?? That is a totally silly statement. I am not ADVERTISING I am simply saying the truth about who I am and what I do.

Context is everything. If you write this on social media, goodreads, whatever, good, that's what they're for. But you wrote it on a WP userpage, and that's not what it's for, stated in more words at WP:UP#NOT. Basically, in almost all cases trying to make WP-articles about oneself and ones work is a waste of time, yours and others. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

I looked on other people's User pages, and mine in exactly like theirs. Furthermore, I was told that I should take what I wrote for my Bio Page, and put it on my UserPage. I am a best selling author who just minted a Psychological Context no one else has ever connected. I've been an author 25 years and I've never had any interest in Wikipedia. Now, I've done something remarkable, and people with limited power are giving me noise. It's just absurd. Its not a COI for an author to make a Wikipedia page that they want to be accurate. Stating FACTS about oneself is not a COI it is FACTS.

Somehow you do seem to be editing Wikipedia under the false premises that we are some-sort of sister-site of Linkedin etc. with a job to house profiles of self-proclaimed leading authors and their achievements.As a volunteer driven encyclopedia, we have strong commitments against any sort of promotional activity and further indulgence in promo-spamming will get you blocked.~ Winged Blades^Godric 13:40, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

NannetteKnowsMen (talk)So let make sure I understand this: if someone I do not know, makes a Wikipedia Page about me, that's okay. But if I make a page about myself, that's self-promotion? Give a break.I don't think Wikipedia's a sister site of Facebook or LinkedIn. I simply did a short and accurate Bio about myself, on a Biography site. It's not self promotion. It's a Biography. NannetteKnowsMen (talk)

Only if it’s written by someone else. 207.38.146.86 (talk) 14:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)NannetteKnowsMen (talk)Which is total bullocks. Not only would someone else be highly prejudicial, but they'd be inaccurate. Now I get why so much stuff I've read on Wikipedia is inaccurate. This entire coconversation explains everything. It is absolutely absurd that a person is verbally flogged if they submit a FACTUAL BIO about themselves. I'm an author, I'm not a salesgirl doing a Bio about herself for attention. NannetteKnowsMen (talk)

False. That’s exactly what you are. And if we allowed that, Wikipedia would be even more inaccurate than it already is. Fortunately, you aren’t going to be an editor here for much longer. 207.38.146.86 (talk) 15:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)NannetteKnowsMen (talk)Incorrect. Fortunately,I have snapshots of everything, and all the bullying and the threats, are just what Wikipedia neither wants nor needs. We'll see who wins in this. Lol.

NannetteKnowsMen, it won't be you that wins. Wikipedia is built on reliable secondary sources by editors that have interest in a subject but no conflict of interest. You writing about yourself is both a primary source and a conflict of interest. People here have only repeatedly explained that to you by knowledgeable and respected editors here. No one has bullied you. (The definition of bully.) In fact, the only one who has been treating others in a threatening, aggressive manner is you. From my own experience, the attitude you are taking will get you no where. I, too, once took a combative approach when dealing with people who "challenged" my edits. I was wrong to do so. I highly recommend that you detach yourself from Wikipedia for a week or so. Reflect on all this. Then decide whether you can constructively edit pages for which you can be neutral and have no conflict of interest (i.e., areas with which you are knowledgeable, will not put you in conflict with others, and are not about yourself.) If you do decide you can do that, I also recommend you stay away from psychology topic pages as those are too close to home to the current problem. 2601:401:500:5D25:BD38:3DAE:7DF4:C58B (talk) 16:10, 25 February 2018

(UTCNannetteKnowsMen (talk) 17:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)I have already won. In Fact, everything you've just stated here, is you projecting yourself and your behavior, onto me. Furthermore, if you were able to be objective, which you clearly are not, you would see that. Whatever issues you have (or had) with Wikipedia has nothing whatsoever to do with me, or my questions.I am not the one who went on attack, four of you have, and your behavior is deplorable. Unlike two other volunteers on here, who kept to business and who answered my questions, four of you have come at me like pit bulls, sarcastic, rude, judgemental and just plain ridiculous. Your former post as proof of that. I suggest you take your own advise, and that you stay away from Psychological (that is the proper term) Pages, since you clearly lack any uunderstanding or self-awareness that you are part of what the issue is here. NannetteKnowsMen (talk) 17:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

People have been trying to help you understand what Wikipedia is, and what Wikipedia isn't. Your personal attacks, threats and bullying aimed at other editors will not help your case. Speaking of some undefined snapshots and complaints dig you even deeper. Just answer one question - are you here to contribute to an encyclopedia as a volunteer, or are you using it to create an autobiography?

Also, please start your answer on a new line, and add your signature (four tildes - ~~~~) at the end of the message. byteflush _Talk 21:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Nannette LaRee Hernandez

Draft:Nannette LaRee Hernandez, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Nannette LaRee Hernandez and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Nannette LaRee Hernandez during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 13:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:The Agony Element™

Draft:The Agony Element™, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Agony Element™ and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:The Agony Element™ during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 13:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It's quite clear you're trying to use Wikipedia to promote yourself and your theories. If that's all you're here for, please stop and go elsewhere to do that. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:30, 25 February 2018 (UTC)NannetteKnowsMen (talk)Your bullying and threats have been snapshot and noted. I amnot 'disruptive editing' nor am I soapboxing, I am responding to idisocracy and people who have delusions of grandeur. Lastly, it's quite clear that I have been an author for decades, that I don't need Wikipedia for promotional reasons, and that I was simply trying to correctly protect myself and my work. The very fact that so many of you are so small minded and petty, and that you have to resort to personal attacks, just makes the mind reel. Fortunately, I have proof of everything, and it's time people saw what sort of 'individuals' are running Wikipedia. I'm the wrong person to push around. NannetteKnowsMen (talk)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 21:40, 25 February 2018 (UTC)