User talk:Namwan Poonyisa

This is Namwan Poonyisa's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Mouchbahani (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christian Mouchbahani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namwan Poonyisa! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jimfbleak, I have noticed that you have blocked my accounts indefinitely due to my use of the account for advertising and promotional purposes. I understand the concerns of this block and have acknowledge the mistakes I made, in terms of remain neutral point of view, reliance on independent sources, and avoid peacock terms. I would like to request for reconsider unblock my account in this matter and would ensure of not violating the Wikipedia's guidelines and policies in my future edits. Namwan Poonyisa (talk) 13:57, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many accounts? Please list them all. Courtesy ping @Jimfbleak: -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Deepfriedokra, I can confirmed that I have only one account for Wikipedia. Namwan Poonyisa (talk) 16:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

-- Deepfriedokra, thanks. Namwan Poonyisa, use the unblock request procedure in the box above. Make sure that you say what sort of topics you will edit if unblocked Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:03, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Namwan Poonyisa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to request the unblocking of my account, Namwan Poonyisa, due to my use of the account for advertising and promotional purposes. I understand the concerns of the blocking administrator and have acknowledge the mistake of violating the regulations, in terms of remain neutral point of view, reliance on reliable and independent sources, and avoid peacock terms. I would like to continue editing and updating company's information to be up-to-date and to improve existing pages, especially Asian culture, by improving sentence structures and errors, adding reliable sources, and updating the information to be up-to-date to enhance the quality of information on Wikipedia. Namwan Poonyisa (talk) 20:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not convincing. Additionally, there's the matter of the Confirmed sockpuppet account, Sarah0991. You were given a chance to come clean and mislead us on this point. Yamla (talk) 20:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.